Hello
Interesting this system, I imagine the potential interest in admission, but why put one in the exhaust
Better than Turbi-Sunflower ... The turbi-lator
Hi Olivier22
it's an idea of our Argentine friend Rodibruno
See it
https://www.econologie.com/forums/un-turbula ... 2-150.html
Hello
it's an idea of our Argentine friend Rodibruno
See it
https://www.econologie.com/forums/un-turbula ... 2-150.html
Hello
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
Bonjour à tous
Yesterday I removed both WITH
Shame ... and I do not even have any consumer reports to give you.
The reason is very simple: loss of power too penalizing on this machine and minus 15 km / h uphill.
My nerves did not hold ... I cracked
Maybe not enough power at the base on this craft and course too hilly
Damage
Hello
Yesterday I removed both WITH
Shame ... and I do not even have any consumer reports to give you.
The reason is very simple: loss of power too penalizing on this machine and minus 15 km / h uphill.
My nerves did not hold ... I cracked
Maybe not enough power at the base on this craft and course too hilly
Damage
Hello
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
Hello bpval
You did not try with only that of admission?
In my opinion, it is above all the turbolomotruchose of the exhaust which chokes the engine.
A+
You did not try with only that of admission?
In my opinion, it is above all the turbolomotruchose of the exhaust which chokes the engine.
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
But tell me ... Well to look at it, I think the one of the admission, you put it downstream of the carbu ??
I think that at this place it can only be harmful (slows the mixture and condenses)
Placed upstream, air filter side, the vortex should promote mixing during suction, in the carburetor.
Like flytox I think you should already test without that of the exhaust (which I still do not understand the interest ), and with that of the upstream carburetor.
And if it still lacks fishing, "open" the WITHCRAFT a little by orienting the blades ...
There's no reason that it works in all-or-nothing this thing
I think that at this place it can only be harmful (slows the mixture and condenses)
Placed upstream, air filter side, the vortex should promote mixing during suction, in the carburetor.
Like flytox I think you should already test without that of the exhaust (which I still do not understand the interest ), and with that of the upstream carburetor.
And if it still lacks fishing, "open" the WITHCRAFT a little by orienting the blades ...
There's no reason that it works in all-or-nothing this thing
0 x
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
Hello bpval
Upstream of the carburetor, I suppose that you will create a big bad turbulence at the level of the carburettor venturi. The result may be random according to the diets etc ...
Downstream, you force the mixing of the air and the gasoline. The amount of gasoline evaporated will increase. There will be a small loss of gas volume admitted, so small power loss to full pot. But normally you should be able to work slightly poorer without tightening or doing bad ignition. The possible gain, I only see it there, at low and medium speed for the couple.
As Olivier22 says after, we will have to look for the appropriate level of turbulence by playing on the boards.
A+
Upstream of the carburetor, I suppose that you will create a big bad turbulence at the level of the carburettor venturi. The result may be random according to the diets etc ...
Downstream, you force the mixing of the air and the gasoline. The amount of gasoline evaporated will increase. There will be a small loss of gas volume admitted, so small power loss to full pot. But normally you should be able to work slightly poorer without tightening or doing bad ignition. The possible gain, I only see it there, at low and medium speed for the couple.
As Olivier22 says after, we will have to look for the appropriate level of turbulence by playing on the boards.
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
So we have two opposing theses!Flytox wrote:Hello bpval
Upstream of the carburetor, I suppose that you will create a big bad turbulence at the level of the carburettor venturi. The result may be random according to the diets etc ...
Downstream, you force the mixing of the air and the gasoline. The amount of gasoline evaporated will increase. There will be a small loss of gas volume admitted, so small power loss to full pot. But normally you should be able to work slightly poorer without tightening or doing bad ignition. The possible gain, I only see it there, at low and medium speed for the couple.
Only way to decide between us, a small test of each
To answer Alain G: That's right It should adjust the main jet (or change if it is a fixed)
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 3 Replies
- 5889 views
-
Last message by houpoupa
View the latest post
06/02/09, 20:26A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 281 guests