Better than Turbi-Sunflower ... The turbi-lator

Tips, advice and tips to lower your consumption, processes or inventions as unconventional engines: the Stirling engine, for example. Patents improving combustion: water injection plasma treatment, ionization of the fuel or oxidizer.
Olivier22
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 178
Registration: 06/11/08, 16:41
Location: 35 / 22
x 6




by Olivier22 » 12/11/08, 02:20

Hello
Interesting this system, I imagine the potential interest in admission, but why put one in the exhaust :?:
0 x
bpval
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 561
Registration: 06/10/06, 17:27




by bpval » 12/11/08, 14:02

Hi Olivier22

it's an idea of ​​our Argentine friend Rodibruno

See it

https://www.econologie.com/forums/un-turbula ... 2-150.html

Hello
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
bpval
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 561
Registration: 06/10/06, 17:27




by bpval » 17/11/08, 07:00

Bonjour à tous

Yesterday I removed both WITH : Shock:
Shame ... and I do not even have any consumer reports to give you.

The reason is very simple: loss of power too penalizing on this machine and minus 15 km / h uphill.

My nerves did not hold ... I cracked : Cry:

Maybe not enough power at the base on this craft and course too hilly

Damage

Hello
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 17/11/08, 20:32

Hello bpval

You did not try with only that of admission?
In my opinion, it is above all the turbolomotruchose of the exhaust which chokes the engine.
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
Olivier22
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 178
Registration: 06/11/08, 16:41
Location: 35 / 22
x 6




by Olivier22 » 17/11/08, 23:09

But tell me ... Well to look at it, I think the one of the admission, you put it downstream of the carbu ??
I think that at this place it can only be harmful (slows the mixture and condenses)
Placed upstream, air filter side, the vortex should promote mixing during suction, in the carburetor.

Like flytox I think you should already test without that of the exhaust (which I still do not understand the interest : Mrgreen: ), and with that of the upstream carburetor.
And if it still lacks fishing, "open" the WITHCRAFT a little by orienting the blades ...
There's no reason that it works in all-or-nothing this thing :D
0 x
bpval
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 561
Registration: 06/10/06, 17:27




by bpval » 18/11/08, 14:05

Ok Ok

Promised juror, I install one upstream of the carburetor, side air filter
In your opinion: the fins on the filter side or on the fuel side ???

Thank you
Hello
0 x
PIF PAF POUM
User avatar
Woodcutter
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4731
Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
x 2




by Woodcutter » 18/11/08, 14:14

Side carbu, otherwise you will disturb him more, the pôvre!
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
Alain G
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3044
Registration: 03/10/08, 04:24
x 3




by Alain G » 18/11/08, 18:51

Hello everyone
If it is a carburettor you put the collector side otherwise you will create a surplus of vaccum carburetor and the mixture will increase considerably (too much).
If it is an injection you put on the side of the filter.
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 18/11/08, 19:27

Hello bpval

Upstream of the carburetor, I suppose that you will create a big bad turbulence at the level of the carburettor venturi. The result may be random according to the diets etc ...

Downstream, you force the mixing of the air and the gasoline. The amount of gasoline evaporated will increase. There will be a small loss of gas volume admitted, so small power loss to full pot. But normally you should be able to work slightly poorer without tightening or doing bad ignition. The possible gain, I only see it there, at low and medium speed for the couple.

As Olivier22 says after, we will have to look for the appropriate level of turbulence by playing on the boards.
A+
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
Olivier22
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 178
Registration: 06/11/08, 16:41
Location: 35 / 22
x 6




by Olivier22 » 18/11/08, 20:22

Flytox wrote:Hello bpval

Upstream of the carburetor, I suppose that you will create a big bad turbulence at the level of the carburettor venturi. The result may be random according to the diets etc ...

Downstream, you force the mixing of the air and the gasoline. The amount of gasoline evaporated will increase. There will be a small loss of gas volume admitted, so small power loss to full pot. But normally you should be able to work slightly poorer without tightening or doing bad ignition. The possible gain, I only see it there, at low and medium speed for the couple.
So we have two opposing theses! :D
Only way to decide between us, a small test of each : Cheesy:

To answer Alain G: That's right :? It should adjust the main jet (or change if it is a fixed)
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 281 guests