you haven't done the opacimetry test on page 15? https://www.econologie.com/forums/economies- ... 1-140.html to be mounted like this:
Capt_Maloche wrote:reminder: clioIII 1.5 DCI 70cv, fuel 90% "normal" diesel + 10% petrol SP95
I mounted on the muffler a 30x30cm cotton cloth fixed with a serflex to "see" what I reject with this mixture
Mount 30sesondes
Recto, beuark !! after 25 km !!
To
In short, after 25Km (work trip), the cloth is downright black dirty! It's amazing to see what rejects a single car! How can we allow this?
If other econologists want to do the same with a full normal and a full excillium type, it would be nice to have other results; you have to wait 200km after changing the fuel to do this test
I'm doing a test this evening with 6% SP95 in my full of GO Ultimate, I have already done 250 km with this mixture, and unlike the mixture with 10% SP95, with 6% there is absolutely no difference engine noise
photos tonight or tomorrow
on my last full of normal / cheap GO, the computer underestimated my consumption (mixed route with air conditioning and a motorway section):
- Computer = 4.9 L / 100
- real = 5.1 L / 100
each time I mixed with gasoline, the consumption of the computer was perfectly right:
Should we conclude that the GOs at the pump are not of the quality required by the manufacturers?