To think, I have doubts on the effectiveness:
(A) in a stabilized speed, a car X with a trajectory Y, a motor Z will consume about the same thing regardless of the regaultion, provided that: (i) you stabilize the speed; B) you limit yourself at an optimum speed; Iii) you do not brake; Iiii) you do not accelerate
B) One day we discussed whether accelerating fast enough but briefly to reach this stabilized speed or accelerating very slowly but for a very long time, which of the two was the most economical; The answer was not decided
So I think that without a complicated system, the few rules of "eco-conduct" allowing everyone to find a good compromise without representing a danger for oneself and for others (any mechanical and blind limitation being potentially dangerous if it is weakened). the day when you have to escape from a bad step by a brutal acceleration ...
Eco driving :
A) Stabilized speed at the lowest possible speed (in general, almost all the way too much milling its engine!) For those who have a computer that gives the conso, move to the higher speed from 1 500 tour instead of 3 000 and Look!
B) anticipate not to have to brake as much as possible (except of course, pedestrian crossing, child playing, red light ...)
Too many people do not know that ironing is consuming !!!
c) adapt the speed to that obtained on the longest ratio at a fairly low speed ...
D) all with well inflated / slightly overinflated tires and a well adjusted engine ...
And I do not believe that electronics will do - blindly - much better! Or else by acting prodigiously!
The speed limiter becomes fuel saver
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 17 Replies
- 31852 views
-
Last message by I Citro
View the latest post
09/11/08, 23:01A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 118 guests