hehe
The goal is not to add energy in the form of hydrogen, because indeed the energy consumed to produce it is necessarily lower than that which will be reinjected into the engine ...
No, the idea is to do hydrogen doping in a way that
improve combustion original fuel. And therefore reduce pollution by reducing the unburnt, and therefore consume less since we burn more of the original fuel. In fact it is exactly the same principle as the pantone.
On my car, the problem is not just the lambda sensor. Because I also tested by disconnecting it and I have no improvement either. Besides, oddly on my box I do not consume more without the lambda probe.
For me "the problem" is quite simply that the engine is already burning a very large part of the fuel and therefore that I have little unburnt. So not much to improve in this way.
This is why, in my humble opinion, hydrogen doping and / or the pantone system are more likely to work on diesel which has a slow combustion and is therefore more likely to reject unburned exhaust.
But I repeat, the goal is not to add energy by hydrogen (with 80L / h of flow, it's really low ...), but to act as a dopant and improve combustion of the original fuel.
Otherwise thank you for your congratulations