Improved Efficiency / Combustion Engines Explosion
chatelot16 wrote:the current car engines are at the optimum in the context where they are, to do better we must get out of the box
+1; The problem is that automakers are striving to promote a framework with engines far too powerful in a technology orgy unrelated to consumer outcomes. These engines are therefore eternally underused in a hyper degraded operation.
The engine on which one should think about does not need hyper technology to do better with already known and proven technologies, should not exceed about 25 or 30HP, would be much better used in its field of "good" performance (in permanently between 30 and 100% of its power) and will be sufficient to make 130 km / h on highway (flat) while consuming half of those present.
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
- chatelot16
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6960
- Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
- Location: Angouleme
- x 264
exactly: we take a 4 cylinder, we cut it in 2 to make a 2 cylinder ... and we alleviate all the rest of the car in the same proportion
to cut a motor in 2 I say that to rigiolate ... it is too quirky ... it is necessary to build new engines
in the meantime do not waste money in new cars, make the old ones last!
there is a big nonsense in the cacalytic pot: it is only a reduction of 50% in some cases: we would have the same benefit by making a much lighter car consumes 2 times less with a simply smaller engine without inventing anything ... and by earning money on both the purchase price and the consumption
we are being scammed with the complexity of the current car!
to cut a motor in 2 I say that to rigiolate ... it is too quirky ... it is necessary to build new engines
in the meantime do not waste money in new cars, make the old ones last!
there is a big nonsense in the cacalytic pot: it is only a reduction of 50% in some cases: we would have the same benefit by making a much lighter car consumes 2 times less with a simply smaller engine without inventing anything ... and by earning money on both the purchase price and the consumption
we are being scammed with the complexity of the current car!
0 x
15 years ago, it was absolutely necessary that I replace my BX by a car with ABS because I felt in danger on the ring road at 110kmh where no one respected the safety distances. If I took my distance, a hysterical motorist doubled me to fall back just before me forcing me to slow down even more ...chatelot16 wrote:in the meantime do not waste money in new cars, make the old ones last!
we are being scammed with the complexity of the current car!
Today, the ring road is at 90kmh, I drive in 106 electric with only 15 horses under the hood, no ABS and I do not feel in danger ...
Of course we are a few to want light cars meeting the excellent criteria of a Mathis 333 which would finally allow us to reconnect with the convergent spiral of common sense; less quickly, less far, less often and above all more efficient because less powerful, lighter and more aerodynamic.
In short, all we love about the excellent speech of Michel Kieffer.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 28 Replies
- 32789 views
-
Last message View Gaston
View the latest post
10/01/13, 16:31A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 7 Replies
- 15831 views
-
Last message View moinsdewatt
View the latest post
07/06/12, 13:24A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 23 Replies
- 39912 views
-
Last message View Woodcutter
View the latest post
08/11/08, 21:00A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 27 Replies
- 35545 views
-
Last message View elephant
View the latest post
02/01/10, 14:17A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
-
- 7 Replies
- 13824 views
-
Last message View skyfish
View the latest post
15/12/05, 20:49A subject posted in the forum : special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction
Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 87 guests