Found on the web, here's another link, scientific approach to the GEET:
<a href='http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GEETDemystified.htm' target='_blank'> http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/Bizarre/GEETD...Demystified.htm </a>
A must read (or be translated !!)
A + atous
"Lu 27 times" the 12 in the morning, and not a comment ......
It seems to me that this article is really interesting, nobody has anything to say ???
Come on, you lachez is the controversy that was born the idea.
B) B) B)
econology wrote:I read this article then ... 2002 beginning it seems to me .... explanations of the author do not convince me entirely, eg tractors water injection is not explainable by these arguments, even if it is one of the + scientific article about the "geet" .... read but do not take as absolute reference!
It is obvious that in the version used for tractors, there is only the water doping that passes into the reactor if the injection system is preserved, so in this case, only must be taken into account this doping.
For cons, I liked his aproach "chemical" of the process and a little research on "magnetogaz" also given to interesting articles qq B), in addition, it also seems to think that the fact of "spiraling gas in the geet improve performance, not for the same reasons as me, because I did not know Ranque-Hilsch Indeed, it increasingly aprendt: rolleyes:
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 2 guests