The planet is burning and we are watching our smartphones.

[Exnihiloest]

Nobody really believes that the planet is burning, because it does not burn, it is only teased because of our needs, including the smartphone.
Even the alarmists who say it do not believe in it, which is why they use smartphones and social networks which nevertheless participate in what they denounce! I even saw some smoke!

Science, and therefore ecology among others, must be used to meet our needs with the minimum of collateral effects. No more than road safety which would ask us not to drive in order not to have an accident, we do not need an ecology which requires us to do without what we see as needs, so as not to have impact on nature! And yet, this is the message that we see from great gurus in the field, probably taking us for perfect fools who would not have already understood it when it is a choice, and which they intend to manipulate and enlist as followers of their sect.

[izentrop]

Nobody really believes that the planet is burning, because it is not burning

Not yet but if we do nothing ...
We suspected that you were going to intervene in this direction. We also know that we teach old monkey nothing with blinders;)

However, there is no longer any doubt A climate domino effect could transform the Earth into an "oven"

[Exnihiloest]

Nobody really believes that the planet is burning, because it is not burning

Not yet but if we do nothing ...
We suspected that you were going to intervene in this direction. We also know that we teach old monkey nothing with blinders;)

However, there is no longer any doubt A climate domino effect could transform the Earth into an "oven"

"no more doubt" but in the link: "could", a conditional! it's beautiful faith! Comrade, beware of janicification, there is no vaccine.

[izentrop]

The untruths of the last climatosceptic pamphlet
The climatologist François-Marie Bréon sees in "The innocence of carbon", the recent book by the physicist François Gervais, an accumulation of errors and manipulations doomed to discredit the observation of anthropogenic warming.

François Gervais' work bears witness to a profound ignorance of climate science. Most of the arguments put forward by the author are in total contradiction with the scientific literature. If the work cites numerous references, they are not specified at the end of the text and it is up to the reader to do the research if he wants to verify the author's assertions. These often have nothing to do with the references supposed to support them. In other cases, his claims are based on obvious errors or misinformation.

Doesn't Exnihiloest tell us that you approve of this physicist's false arguments?

[Janic]

"no more doubt" but in the link: "could", a conditional! it's beautiful faith! Comrade, beware of janicification, there is no vaccine

which demonstrates the uselessness of vaccines, even their dangerousness.
that said, there is no janicification any more than a cog in a machine is the machine. You religiously believe in the saving virtues of vaccines and other products out of the imaginations of pasteurian sorcerers. It's your choice, or your conditioning, (it depends) just as others make political choices convinced that their choice is not only the right one, but is and must be the one and only choice allowed. (which is usually called non-choice or totalitarianism). Comrade, wake up and open your eyes to the reality that needs to be supported by evidence that neither you nor your friends are able to provide.

[izentrop]

If we had listened to it at the time, we would not be there ...

[Exnihiloest]

...
Doesn't Exnihiloest tell us that you approve of this physicist's false arguments?

No of course, I only agree with the real arguments of François Gervais, professor emeritus, namely that human influence on the current warming is minimal and that the latter is the result of natural cycles.

[izentrop]

I'll do as with Janic, ignore your comments without a realistic argument.

To see tonight on C8 at 21H10 Is the planet (really) screwed up? https://tv-programme.com/la-planete-est ... cumentaire

[izentrop]

[Janic]

I'll do as with Janic, ignore your comments without a realistic argument.

oh, the fun! It is the hospital which laught at the charity. Where is the evidence of all kinds that you persist in not presenting? How could you also present what does not exist!