ENERC wrote:At least 20 pages rotten by climate skeptics ...
If there is an "official science" and your only argument is the argument of authority, tell us right away, we will know that we will no longer have to talk about science or present facts and logical relationships.
I remind you that science, unlike religions, is not a set of dogmas in which one should blindly believe.
I remind you that the scientific method, unlike religions, is based on doubt.
I remind you that science, unlike religions, evolves and that knowledge is reviewed from one era to another.
I remind you that science, unlike democracy, is not subject to the majority. If it was, Einstein's relativity would never have passed.
Finally, I would remind you that there are scientists who doubt the climate and its evolution as it is presented to us today, that they have solid, logical and rational arguments, and that entering into denial by brandishing its blinders and the fallacy of dishonor by association is much more an Islamist posture in the face of a caricature of Muhammad than a scientific attitude.