The latest figures and weather consequences of global warming

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The "less powerful" and "much lighter" cars are that we had in the first half of the 1th century.
I am always amazed by the fools brandishing the long-corrected problems of the past as solutions.

I am even more astonished that fools, even more stupid than I can be even forcing myself, call these solutions "problems" and that they dare to say without laughing, that they are "settled" ... by what ? The manufacture of heavy, powerful tanks, with cabinet aerodynamics, consuming two arms and two legs, stuffed with unnecessary gadgets to roll at 30/50/80 and 130 ??? We are no longer even in stupidity, we are in mental illness!

[Obamot]

There are very revere the “funny ” inner conflicts over what ”really happens when everything around you collapses ...

When Macronlini does not play politics and lives in his care bear bubble ...
Politics takes care of him ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Rubbish: Kuwait's 'biggest tire cemetery' move completed

For years, a pile of tires a few kilometers from the capital haunted Kuwaitis. The latter feared the repeated fires which had broken out there. The site has finally been dismantled ... to be transferred elsewhere, while waiting for recycling operations, which promise to be complicated.

The dismantling of the site had been planned for a long time, according to Al-Rai, but had taken many delays; 44 round trips by trucks made it possible to move the tires from Arhiya to Salmi, their new destination, located a little further in the desert.

Simply moved from one place to another

What a “grandiose success for our leaders”, quips Hassan Al-Issa, columnist at Al-Jarida. “The images of senior officials in front of the cameras pinning each other with ribbons to celebrate their astonishing success fill us with hope that our country will be able to meet the challenges of the future.”

https://www.courrierinternational.com/a ... -au-koweit

[humus]

The "less powerful" and "much lighter" cars are that we had in the first half of the 1th century.
I am always amazed by the fools brandishing the long-corrected problems of the past as solutions.

The fine team of pests is in good shape ...
How much did the cars of the 1st half of the 20th century consume?

For the other, I pass, see my second signature, I would not like to be contaminated, I am not vaccinated

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

How much did the cars of the 1st half of the 20th century consume? <<< Ford T: between 540 and 700 Kg, 20 Cv, 11 and 19 l / 100, Citroen Type A: 810 Kg, 18 Cv, 7.5 L / 100)

That's not the subject, let's see. The problems of the past (Lightness, power) are resolved.

[izentrop]

The world on a "catastrophic" path towards a warming of + 2,7 ° C

The report assessing the national commitments of 191 countries, released on Friday, "shows that the world is on a catastrophic path towards + 2,7 ° C of warming," said UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

The Paris Agreement aims to limit this warming to well below + 2 ° C compared to the pre-industrial era, if possible + 1,5 ° C, but "the failure to meet this objective will be measured by the yardstick of the number of deaths and means of subsistence destroyed ", he insisted, calling on all governments to propose more ambitious commitments.

Under the Paris Agreement, each country was to revise its "Nationally Determined Contribution" (NDC) by the end of 2020.

But as of July 30, only 113 countries representing less than half of global greenhouse gas emissions (49%) had actually submitted their revised commitments. https://www.msn.com/fr-fr/actualite/mon ... d=msedgntp

[ABC2019]

The world on a "catastrophic" path towards a warming of + 2,7 °

you who have a Cartesian and scientific mind, have you understood the method of calculating the temperature with a number after the decimal point at the end of the century from the commitments made by the countries?

on the other hand when we say

A "considerable" increase which "could lead to a rise in temperature of around 2,7 ° C by the end of the century" while each additional fraction of a degree multiplies the dramatic consequences.

is that scientifically established? what is the multiplicative factor of "dramatic consequences" by an additional tenth of ° C?

[izentrop]

is that scientifically established? What is the multiplicative factor of "dramatic consequences" by an additional tenth of a ° C?

Yes, by the vast majority of climate scientists and especially since 1989 where the satellites scrutinize the smallest part of the world, soil, sea, atmosphere with more and more precision and weighting, but you remain stuck on the opinion of " climato realistes "like Richard Lindzen or this Belgian professor https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2 ... font-peur/ for example.
You are not anti-science like antivax and other anti-GMO followers of "it's not natural", but your attitude towards the climate is also limited.

[Obamot]

your attitude towards the climate is also limited.

Speaking of bounded, do you have satellite data from 40 years ago?

I am not a climate skeptic and as it stands it would be prudent to take all possible measures against global warming. It would go in the right direction ... But we would have to stop with the peremptory assertions.

[ABC2019]

is that scientifically established? What is the multiplicative factor of "dramatic consequences" by an additional tenth of a ° C?

Yes, by the vast majority of climate scientists and especially since 1989 where satellites scrutinize the smallest part of the world, soil, sea, atmosphere with more and more precision and weighting,

cool, so what then is the value of the multiplicative coefficient at every tenth of ° C, since it is "set precisely"?

I mean, it's like the vaccine versus anti-vaccine debate, at one point you have to put in numbers right? otherwise we can tell anything ...