The zetetic circle warming denier?

[Christophe]

not econome
but spend a has a superior density of energy

Sure ... We listen to your proposals

[thejoker]

fusion and cold fusion

[Christophe]

Yes, be 2 chimeras today ...

[Woodcutter]

It also is the student Plaisantin?

[Christophe]

No it is I feel breathless

[Woodcutter]

so

N2 is not a greenhouse gas, O2 is not a GHG, Argon is not a GHG and there we are already at 99,997% of the "dry" atmosphere.

yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?

Yes, finally a little more, I screwed up my bill the other day!
In fact the sum would be 99,964% so it remains 0.036% for the rest, knowing that the CO2 is already 0.0382%, it lacks a tip! (Probably a failover O2 to CO2 by défossilisation C)
But overall the orders of magnitude are there, knowing that all the gas the less common CO2 represent maximum ppmv 30 or 0.003% mons ...

and what% half max produti by man?

and what part is propelled into the atmosphere?

The propelled part in the atmopshere? While we talk about atmospheric composition?
Are you stupid?

[Woodcutter]

yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?

Nope has steam ...

so c the water vapor that is responsible for warming
or water vapor is the clouds, right?

Yes, I did not mention water vapor, it was the composition of the "dry" atmosphere because we cannot give% of water vapor in the air since it is never constant!

Indeed, water vapor is considered to be responsible for a little over 50% of the greenhouse effect (and not of "warming").

Otherwise, NO steam is not the clouds ...

A cloud (when we see it) is an assembly of liquid or solid water, the vapor being invisible.

[Woodcutter]

the creation of clouds is the thesis of Svensmark and therefore according to solar activity

no co² in there ....

which of you is interested in Svensmark ??

Super!
The clouds waited for Svensmark to start forming!

Well, no kidding, it is obvious that Svensmark's work is interesting, and that it will be even more interesting to follow the "same" large-scale experiment at CERN (CLOUD program).

Here, an amusing excerpt from Martin:

There are other theories about global warming or rather changes (more or less natural?) The temperature of our planet over the ages. I have described that both theories that hold the upper hand at the moment: the proponents of the greenhouse effect due to CO2 generated by man (endorsed exclusively by the IPCC and widely publicized) and the (still in shadow) from particularly active solar flares right now .... why we do we hide this? For us to make fossil energy? We are smart enough to act well without it conceals scientific debate, right?

Ben not precisely, without constraints, the man only goes to what is easiest for him ...

Another thing that bothers me in these theories of "all solar": should the variations in cloud cover (supposed to be lower now, therefore less albedo and more radiation reaching the earth's surface) find in the weather data, at least for the last few years, with satellite photos, etc ...?
I have not seen this anywhere, proven correlation cloudiness / temperature ...

[Woodcutter]

emaballement of a warming while we know that lower temperatures average age?
we are going towards a glacial period

Lesser than in the Middle Ages, it remains to be demonstrated on the whole planet...
The ice age is okay, yes, but frankly not very fast ...

and finally how water vapor and clouds have to do with the co²?

[nikoteen]

What I like about the Zetetics is the way they are unable to change their point of view and question their "beliefs" ...

The Circle Zététique is not LA or zetetic THE zététiciens. Thank you to leave responsibility remarks and arguments put forward by the association to its members alone (they are not many).

Thanks in advance.

- nikoteen
Zetetic Observatory
http://www.observatoire-zetetique.org