thejoker wrote:not econome
but spend a has a superior density of energy
Sure ... We listen to your proposals
thejoker wrote:not econome
but spend a has a superior density of energy
Yes, finally a little more, I screwed up my bill the other day!thejoker wrote:soyaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?N2 is not a greenhouse gas, O2 is not a GHG, Argon is not a GHG and there we are already at 99,997% of the "dry" atmosphere.
The propelled part in the atmopshere? While we talk about atmospheric composition?thejoker wrote:and what% half max produti by man?
and what part is propelled into the atmosphere?
Yes, I did not mention water vapor, it was the composition of the "dry" atmosphere because we cannot give% of water vapor in the air since it is never constant!thejoker wrote:Christophe wrote:thejoker wrote:yaurait than 0.003% would be greenhouse gas?
Nope has steam ...
so c the water vapor that is responsible for warming
or water vapor is the clouds, right?
Super!thejoker wrote:the creation of clouds is the thesis of Svensmark and therefore according to solar activity
no co² in there ....
which of you is interested in Svensmark ??
Ben not precisely, without constraints, the man only goes to what is easiest for him ...Unique thought wrote:There are other theories about global warming or rather changes (more or less natural?) The temperature of our planet over the ages. I have described that both theories that hold the upper hand at the moment: the proponents of the greenhouse effect due to CO2 generated by man (endorsed exclusively by the IPCC and widely publicized) and the (still in shadow) from particularly active solar flares right now .... why we do we hide this? For us to make fossil energy? We are smart enough to act well without it conceals scientific debate, right?
Lesser than in the Middle Ages, it remains to be demonstrated on the whole planet...thejoker wrote:emaballement of a warming while we know that lower temperatures average age?
we are going towards a glacial period
thejoker wrote:and finally how water vapor and clouds have to do with the co²?
Christophe wrote:What I like about the Zetetics is the way they are unable to change their point of view and question their "beliefs" ...
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 146 guests