Ahmed wrote:And also with the total denial of a popular consultation, that for Notre-Dame-Des-Landes.
This referendum was decided from above, on a project supported by the government and already decided, but intended to help it out by creating a counter-fire vis-à-vis determined opponents; for this reason, its modalities: formulation of the question and definition of the population consulted have been carefully configured to elicit a positive response. As then the real reasons for this project became obsolete, this "democratic" masquerade no longer made sense and the abandonment of the project could then be used as a concession to the ecology whereas it did not testify to other than the decrease in the influence of Jean-Marc Ayrault to impose this technically useless extension ...
We must carefully be wary of what covers the words "popular" or "democratic" which is almost systematically instrumentalized in its opposite: look at North Korea or China as well as all past dictatorships ...
This is also true.
What in the procedure of the subject "referendum-RCI" must especially be wary and be VERY VIGILANT on the possible breakdown of voters (it may not have been ideal to NDDL) and of course the question asked.