The 150 CCC proposals

[sicetaitsimple]

So what????? No reactions? I did not see anything on the hydroxychloroquine there, this perhaps explains that ....

I put you the link: https://propositions.conventioncitoyenn ... climat.fr/

It is stupid, a priori they are classified by theme, then by objective, then by proposal and not numbered.

Not easy to find....

There is food and drink for all tastes. And often very vague stuff. Except (for example) the 110km / h on highway which is already making waves !!!

[Christophe]

I bet there is no advice of idleness and lowering our lifestyle by 50% ... if?

In other words: annual climate containment?

In short still insufficient blabla ... very ...

When I see that 3 km of cycle paths are charged 1.5 M € I think that we should not count on humanity to save the climate !!

[sicetaitsimple]

I bet there is no advice of idleness and lowering our lifestyle by 50% ... if?

In short still insufficient blabla ... very ...

I haven't seen everything! But actually the passage from the legal working time to 28h weekly which was a proposed proposal has gone by the wayside !

[Christophe]

28h paid 40h I presume?

In short, everyone is a civil servant?

[sicetaitsimple]

28h paid 40h I presume?

I imagine that yes, must not mess around!

[ENERC]

There are measures that should have been taken a long time ago and that do not offend anyone:
- Make available the means of supplying power to ships alongside to allow a reduction in emissions linked to the use of engines
- Impose regular monitoring of driver training in eco-driving
- Reform agricultural education and training:


And evidence that lobbyists have blocked for a long time:
- Make mandatory the display of greenhouse gas emissions in shops and places of consumption as well as in advertisements for brands
- Gradual implementation of a glass deposit system (washable and reusable)
- Nitrogenous fertilizers: Increase the General Tax on Polluting Activities (TGAP)
- Tax ultra-processed products with a high carbon footprint and low nutritional intake
- Constrain by strong measures public spaces and tertiary buildings to reduce their energy consumption. (since the time that I ask that the urban lighting is cut in the villages of less than 50 houses from 23 p.m. to 5 a.m. ...)

The strongest measure is the obligation to renovate buildings before 2040.

For the 110 km / h, it's anecdotal and they would have done better not to talk about it. Moreover, the highways are already regulating speed at 110 to smooth traffic.

[Christophe]

28h paid 40h I presume?

I imagine that yes, must not mess around!

Ah ah ah, so completely ineffective !!

It is our lifestyle that must be drastically reduced !! Live with 500 € instead of 2000 € !! And stop drooling over the accumulation of personal wealth (beautiful house, beautiful car ...), but rather ridicule these signs of wealth!

But I am a sweet dreamer and I know that it will not happen tomorrow ...

I do not understand, however, that I am one of the only ones to say that ... ah yes, maybe because I am not a spunk of false ass!

[Paul72]

I bet there is no advice of idleness and lowering our lifestyle by 50% ... if?

In short still insufficient blabla ... very ...

I haven't seen everything! But actually the passage from the legal working time to 28h weekly which was a proposed proposal has gone by the wayside !

To give everyone a job, just remove the oil, it will compensate with twice human labor. And too bad for retirement.

[Christophe]

It's also true !! (+ other fossil fuels eh ...)

But so retrograde ...

[GuyGadebois]

To give everyone a job, just remove the oil, it will compensate with twice human labor. And too bad for retirement.

Why are the big oil companies paying for our pensions?