sicetaitsimple wrote:Why don't you do your BRF with the mop? It is technically entirely possible!
Why don't you pay fools to write your posts?
sicetaitsimple wrote:Why don't you do your BRF with the mop? It is technically entirely possible!
Ahmed wrote:When I speak of sophisticated tools, I am not referring to the existing, but to what is happening (robotics + AI) and which is therefore likely to induce profound changes.
sicetaitsimple wrote:Ahmed wrote:When I speak of sophisticated tools, I am not referring to the existing, but to what is happening (robotics + AI) and which is therefore likely to induce profound changes.
So there would be a "brutal" break in the evolution of "mechanization" or "robotization" from which it would have become or would become unacceptable?
When will it be?
(I would rather write: When do you place it? )When will it be?
Ahmed wrote:Sicetaitsimple, I did not talk about a sudden break, but (reread my previous post) what exists has already changed society and it is what appears that will continue to turn it upside down.
You write:(I would rather write: When do you place it? )When will it be?
However, if we are to speak of a rupture, it should be situated when the productivity gains in a sector do not find a new sector in which the destroyed jobs can be massively transferred. Obviously, this is a social breakdown, since it denies the possibility of holding a job without the obligation to do so being removed ...
PS: I cannot explain to myself the persistence of the causticity of your words "with low contributory value"?
Ahmed wrote:When I speak of "low contributory value", it is obviously not to qualify all of your messages,
sicetaitsimple wrote:Of which act ... But in this case, do not forget to qualify many others, rather than dubbing them.
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 121 guests