Test your ecological footprint ...

Pear Belle Helene · by **Pear Belle Helene** » 19/09/09, 09:59

It is true that I do not drink and do not smoke ............. : Mrgreen:

I Citro · by **I Citro** » 21/09/09, 11:02

Pear Belle Helene wrote:It is true that I do not drink and do not smoke .............

Neither do I. Neither me nor my cars. : Mrgreen:

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 21/09/09, 11:19

So how do you ... suck my dear citro? : Cheesy:

Be careful with Pear: these times as soon as there are : Mrgreen:

= sexual connotation : Cheesy:

Pear Belle Helene · by **Pear Belle Helene** » 21/09/09, 11:29

Christophe wrote:So how do you ... suck citro?

Be careful with Pear: these times as soon as there are = sexual connotation

Po at all

Christophe · by **Christophe** » 21/09/09, 11:38

Ah here is the exception which proves the rule ... : Cheesy:

I Citro · by **I Citro** » 21/09/09, 12:09

Christophe wrote:Ah here is the exception which proves the rule ...

Yep, Monday, I forget. : Mrgreen:

Frankly, me, always so serious ... : Lol:

Shokin · by **Shokin** » 19/10/09, 01:04

Well, I just did this test, this Monday, October 19, 2009 at 00:45 am in Friborg, Switzerland. Here are my results:

0.80 planets

My footprint per hectare:

Carbon: me 5.8, my country 12.4
Food: me 4.5, my country 9
Housing: me 1.0, my country 3.7
Goods and service: me 1.2, my country 4.4
TOTAL: me 12.5, my country 29.5

The share of my footprint per biome:

Crop footprint: 12%
Pasture footprint: 30%
Footprint of marine fisheries: 22%
Forest footprint: 36%

0.8 planet! well then, say it ! I didn't think I would do as well. When I think of everything I can still improve.

Shokin

cybfil · by **cybfil** » 14/07/10, 06:28

Small educational test ........ for my part:

Carbon: 2.95
Food: 7.24
Housing: 1.20
Goods & services: 0.32
Total: 11.71 ====> 0.75 planet.

hi thread.

sherkanner · by **sherkanner** » 14/07/10, 11:32

If everyone on the planet lived like me, we would need: 1.70 planet (s) Earth

Okay, ok, my annual 25000km in fuel oil drags down my result.

And I don't have my straw house or my garden yet ^^ so I would only get better.

oiseautempete · by **oiseautempete** » 14/07/10, 12:32

Christophe wrote:Economists are idiots.

Indeed, the emergence of poor countries will pull us down, and not only a little, moreover the phenomenon is already largely underway ... The only possible correction is the global limitation of the birth rate to bring back in the medium term the world population at an acceptable level compatible with a modern global and "reasonable" life (not the American "model"!), and unfortunately that would require an authoritarian regulation (see China), see eugenics (prohibition of reproduction for people with serious genetic deficits), to compensate for the disappearance of natural selection in humans ... I can all the more evoke it as I apply it to myself ...

Join an algorithmic censorship-free community of enthusiasts, technicians, scientists or engineers. Ads removed after registration.

Test your ecological footprint ...

Who is online ?

Do a in-depth textual research ou look for an image, a drawing, a graphic on the forum

Explanations on the image search by Google or Qwant or other.