To discover dynamically here the few pages / slides of the Negawatt energy scenario:
https://negawatt.org/scenario/ published in 2017 it is still largely valid ... of course!
It's not difficult to be clean brothel m ... of !!
NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79330
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11046
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9807
- Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
- Location: Lower Normandy
- x 2659
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
Christophe wrote:It's not difficult to be clean brothel m ... of !!
You mean "it's not complicated to make a clean infographic"? Or "it's not complicated to make a clean script"?
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13704
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1518
- Contact :
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
To want at all costs to discard the nuclear option, their scenario is not realistic https://www.lemondedelenergie.com/negaw ... 018/10/02/
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 751
- Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
- x 40
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?
0 x
- sen-no-sen
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6856
- Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
- Location: High Beaujolais.
- x 749
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
Eric Dupont wrote:Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?
The problem is related to the fact that this information is not fair. Based on the German experience we come to a nuclear output (in France) for about 2500 3000 billion euros ...
The point is that the most conceivable "solution" is a nuclear / renewable energy mix.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9807
- Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
- Location: Lower Normandy
- x 2659
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
Beyond the way electricity would be produced, which is a subject in itself, what seems to me more than ambitious is to reduce the final energy consumption of 56% between 2015 and 2050, despite a supposed increase in the population of about ten million (see specimen book on the site Negawatt, it is not specified in the infographic).
0 x
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 751
- Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
- x 40
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
sen-no-sen wrote:Eric Dupont wrote:Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?
The problem is related to the fact that this information is not fair. Based on the German experience we come to a nuclear output (in France) for about 2500 3000 billion euros ...
The point is that the most conceivable "solution" is a nuclear / renewable energy mix.
the result is that in Germany, there is less fuel poverty. Sila exit of the nucleus for the Germans had to listen so expensive there would logically be a great energy precariousness, no?
https://www.environnement-magazine.fr/e ... g-europeen
energy precariousness is when we can not pay its electricity bill and French homes are more affected than German homes
0 x
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
So Dupont, that's it, you're a billionaire?
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
- sen-no-sen
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6856
- Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
- Location: High Beaujolais.
- x 749
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
Eric Dupont wrote:the result is that in Germany, there is less fuel poverty. If the output of the nuclear power for the Germans had cost so much, there would logically be a great energy precariousness, no?
It is difficult to compare the output of the German nuclear (11% of electricity production) with the French situation which is eyeing the 75%.
Energy poverty in France as in Germany is neck and neck.
France is ranked 10th in Europe, with a domestic fuel poverty score of 73,3 points against 75,8 for Germany.
Moreover, Germany is not yet completely out of nuclear power (2022), their dependence on fossil energy still remains the majority in the production of electricity (around 50%).
Little up to illustrate the subject.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
-
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 751
- Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
- x 40
Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online
GuyGadebois wrote:So Dupont, that's it, you're a billionaire?
we can already say that I have a great wealth since I explored a domainne which concerns the future of humanity, and which will allow to leave fossil energy: energy storage has high yield and low cost . the pro nuclear we repeat 250000 once on all forums , press articles, paid "experts", renewable energy would be intermittent energy that we do not know stored. I completely agree with them, they don't know but I do, and that's exactly what makes my wealth. sooner or later negawatt will be able to enrich his script with this new knowledge, insofar as this association intends to propose something realistic.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 114 Replies
- 68850 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
22/05/13, 14:37A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 241 guests