NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online

Warming and Climate Change: causes, consequences, analysis ... Debate on CO2 and other greenhouse gas.
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79330
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11046

NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by Christophe » 20/11/19, 13:20

To discover dynamically here the few pages / slides of the Negawatt energy scenario:

https://negawatt.org/scenario/ published in 2017 it is still largely valid ... of course!

It's not difficult to be clean brothel m ... of !! : Cheesy:
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9807
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2659

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by sicetaitsimple » 20/11/19, 20:53

Christophe wrote:It's not difficult to be clean brothel m ... of !! : Cheesy:


You mean "it's not complicated to make a clean infographic"? Or "it's not complicated to make a clean script"?
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13704
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1518
Contact :

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by izentrop » 20/11/19, 22:11

To want at all costs to discard the nuclear option, their scenario is not realistic https://www.lemondedelenergie.com/negaw ... 018/10/02/
0 x
Eric DUPONT
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 751
Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
x 40

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by Eric DUPONT » 21/11/19, 08:29

Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?
0 x
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by sen-no-sen » 21/11/19, 10:36

Eric Dupont wrote:Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?


The problem is related to the fact that this information is not fair. Based on the German experience we come to a nuclear output (in France) for about 2500 3000 billion euros ...
The point is that the most conceivable "solution" is a nuclear / renewable energy mix.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9807
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2659

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by sicetaitsimple » 21/11/19, 11:50

Beyond the way electricity would be produced, which is a subject in itself, what seems to me more than ambitious is to reduce the final energy consumption of 56% between 2015 and 2050, despite a supposed increase in the population of about ten million (see specimen book on the site Negawatt, it is not specified in the infographic).
0 x
Eric DUPONT
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 751
Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
x 40

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by Eric DUPONT » 21/11/19, 12:30

sen-no-sen wrote:
Eric Dupont wrote:Well, since photovoltaics and wind turbines produce less energy than oil or nuclear energy, where is the problem?


The problem is related to the fact that this information is not fair. Based on the German experience we come to a nuclear output (in France) for about 2500 3000 billion euros ...
The point is that the most conceivable "solution" is a nuclear / renewable energy mix.


the result is that in Germany, there is less fuel poverty. Sila exit of the nucleus for the Germans had to listen so expensive there would logically be a great energy precariousness, no?

https://www.environnement-magazine.fr/e ... g-europeen

energy precariousness is when we can not pay its electricity bill and French homes are more affected than German homes
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by GuyGadebois » 21/11/19, 12:44

So Dupont, that's it, you're a billionaire? : Mrgreen:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
sen-no-sen
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6856
Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
Location: High Beaujolais.
x 749

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by sen-no-sen » 21/11/19, 13:10

Eric Dupont wrote:the result is that in Germany, there is less fuel poverty. If the output of the nuclear power for the Germans had cost so much, there would logically be a great energy precariousness, no?


It is difficult to compare the output of the German nuclear (11% of electricity production) with the French situation which is eyeing the 75%.
Energy poverty in France as in Germany is neck and neck.
France is ranked 10th in Europe, with a domestic fuel poverty score of 73,3 points against 75,8 for Germany.
Moreover, Germany is not yet completely out of nuclear power (2022), their dependence on fossil energy still remains the majority in the production of electricity (around 50%).
Image
Little up to illustrate the subject.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Eric DUPONT
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 751
Registration: 13/10/07, 23:11
x 40

Re: NegaWatt 2017 Scenario Online




by Eric DUPONT » 21/11/19, 14:07

GuyGadebois wrote:So Dupont, that's it, you're a billionaire? : Mrgreen:


we can already say that I have a great wealth since I explored a domainne which concerns the future of humanity, and which will allow to leave fossil energy: energy storage has high yield and low cost . the pro nuclear we repeat 250000 once on all forums , press articles, paid "experts", renewable energy would be intermittent energy that we do not know stored. I completely agree with them, they don't know but I do, and that's exactly what makes my wealth. sooner or later negawatt will be able to enrich his script with this new knowledge, insofar as this association intends to propose something realistic.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 241 guests