Ahmed wrote:It is not a question of "little habits", or else we must understand by this adaptations to given situations (on the scale of the human lifetime) which are called into question by a change which invalidates the provisions. earlier. I think that's what you mean?
yes we call it what we want, what I mean is that the changes that upset the life of a generation do not date today, as a certain discourse tends to make us believe. It always existed, and we survived it (with much less means than now).
But the criteria as usual are very elastic. We are alarmed at the possibility of refugees from the Maldives, totally imaginary given that the surface of the atolls does not decrease, that their population increases, and that in addition their main economy comes from tourism and that therefore they would have much more to suffer from the prohibition of the flights of planes that of a few tens of cm of water, knowing that the atolls climbed 100 m with the level of the sea. On the other hand the million Chinese refugees displaced without compensation because of the dam of the three gorges, which is a renewable energy therefore "clean", that nobody cares.
Note also that it is the same for skiing, which is the subject of the thread. Perhaps the warming threatens the lowest at altitude, but if we remove oil and fossils, then we must close them all !! which for the mountains would be rather a good thing ...
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)