each year we emit around 35 Gt of CO2 for an increase of 2 ppm. If you lower the emissions by 10%, it will only remove 0,2 ppm. If you wanted to gain 1 ppm per year, you would have to cut emissions in half. It is not won, and in addition it would not be enough, since at the end it is necessary to arrive at ZERO fossils.
This is what people do not realize when they say "ya ka" to remove fossils.
OMM: concentration of CO2 record!
Re: WMO: record CO2 concentration!
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Re: WMO: record CO2 concentration!
Even if we assume that the combustion of petroleum coal and gas is reduced to zero, this would probably not drop immediately because of the inertia of the system. Of course, the temperature would continue to rise for years and years ...
0 x
I'm allergic to idiots: sometimes I even get a cough.
Re: WMO: record CO2 concentration!
Paul72 wrote:Even if we assume that the combustion of petroleum coal and gas is reduced to zero, this would probably not drop immediately because of the inertia of the system. Of course, the temperature would continue to rise for years and years ...
if we talk about the CO2 concentration, if it would drop right away. But probably not the temperature actually.
Except that the current crisis gives an idea of the price to pay, and it is undoubtedly the simplest explanation of why one does not do it, finally not voluntarily in a perennial way in any case.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79113
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
Re: WMO: record CO2 concentration!
ABC2019 wrote:each year we emit around 35 Gt of CO2 for an increase of 2 ppm. If you lower the emissions by 10%, it will only remove 0,2 ppm. If you wanted to gain 1 ppm per year, you would have to cut emissions in half. It is not won, and in addition it would not be enough, since at the end it is necessary to arrive at ZERO fossils.
This is what people do not realize when they say "ya ka" to remove fossils.
Thank you for this reminder
Indeed it is not won there ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79113
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
Re: WMO: record CO2 concentration!
Paul72 wrote:Even if we assume that the combustion of petroleum coal and gas is reduced to zero, this would probably not drop immediately because of the inertia of the system. Of course, the temperature would continue to rise for years and years ...
Yes and add the climatic feedback loops that we have already initiated (acidification of the oceans, melting of permafrost ...)
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : Bing [Bot] and 143 guests