No scientific consensus on climate change

Warming and Climate Change: causes, consequences, analysis ... Debate on CO2 and other greenhouse gas.
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by ABC2019 » 28/02/21, 18:39

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:.... because I don't think the amount of reserves is such that it makes RC dangerous.

He's ALREADY dangerous ... : roll:

on what criteria?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12307
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2968

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by Ahmed » 28/02/21, 18:47

The problem of all-out energy dissipation is far from being limited to CC, it is time to get out of the boxes a little by removing the blinders ...
On the other hand, as explicitly suggested Eclectron, the market operates in the short term, it is therefore unsuitable for a project of a magnitude that requires as wide an anticipation as possible; on the other hand, the market is by nature incompetent to solve a problem of which it is the cause. This is evident through the current posturing about the so-called ecological or energy transition (your choice!) Which only aims to restart the machine with the massive deployment of regulatory obsolescence.

I see thatABC fully exploits its vein of reverse maieutics ... : roll: Have you never thought of using the same procedure for his assertions?
3 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14931
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4346

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 28/02/21, 18:52

ABC2019 wrote:
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:.... because I don't think the amount of reserves is such that it makes RC dangerous.

He's ALREADY dangerous ... : roll:

on what criteria?

Seek.
0 x
eclectron
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2922
Registration: 21/06/16, 15:22
x 397

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by eclectron » 28/02/21, 18:55

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:He's ALREADY dangerous ... : roll:

on what criteria?

Seek.

i do it for him : Mrgreen:
Yet a nozzle has a piercing eye ... : roll:

https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/agricul ... 1539019474

or in picture:
Image

And I can predict his response from disinformation and liberal denial.
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by ABC2019 » 28/02/21, 19:06

eclectron wrote:And I can predict his response from disinformation and liberal denial.

droughts did not exist before global warming?

http://la.climatologie.free.fr/secheres ... resse1.htm

Droughts in Europe:

It was in 1303 that we experienced the most important drought of the millennium. You could cross the dry Rhine on foot.

the other droughts were in 1540, 1719, 1874, 1906, 1911, 1921, 1945, 1947, 1949, 1953, 1957, 1964, 1976, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992 and 2003. It is from 1922 to 1952 , that France has experienced a very strong warming in summer because of a repetitive southerly flow.

In 1788, France experienced a terribly dry spring and summer, which compromised harvests.

In 1911, it was the only year of the century when we exceeded 35 ° C during the months of July, August and September in Paris (32 days above 30 ° C in Paris and 53 days in Marseille!)

In 1921, only 200 mm of rain was recorded in Nancy and 278 mm in Paris. The drought lasted the whole year. This summer was truly even drier than that of 1976.

In 1949, the summer started earlier. It was already over 30 ° C in April in the northern half, and the drought lasted all summer with extremely high temperatures.

In 1976 the drought was so severe it is remembered by everyone as one of the worst drought years of the late 20th century in Europe (see below).

In 1994, July and August had 56 days of temperatures above 30 ° C in Marseille-Marignane and 60 days of temperatures above 30 ° C in Le Luc, including 31 days in July.

In July 1950, at Luc there were 19 days of temperatures above 35 ° C (a record still not broken).

In July 1983, in Carpentras there were 15 days of temperatures above 35 ° C and 11 days in Marseille.

In 2003 from March to August, a drought more important than that of 1989 settled in Europe (see below).


Hello goldfish! : Mrgreen:
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
ENERC
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 725
Registration: 06/02/17, 15:25
x 255

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by ENERC » 28/02/21, 19:06

It smells like scorching for the last defenders of all oil / coal / gas:

China may deploy up to 75 GW of PV this year
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/02/26/ ... this-year/

BloombergNEF expects up to 209 GW of new solar for this year
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/02/23/ ... this-year/
Image

Car side:
Image

Within 10 years, 50% of new cars will be electric.

Like dinosaurs, oil and coal and gas will go extinct. There will remain a few nostalgic for the all-oil period on the forums, but we don't care.

Besides, the company Total is going to change its name!
In early February 2021, management announced that it wanted to change its name and take the name of TotalEnergies to bounce back on the energy transition. The transformation will be proposed to the general meeting of shareholders in May 2021.
(Wikipedia)
1 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by ABC2019 » 28/02/21, 19:24

ENERC wrote:It smells scorched for the last defenders of all oil / coal / gas :)

If you speak for me, I'm not defending anything at all, I just said that if we can replace them, it will happen naturally. We'll see if your predictions come true, if so, so much the better!
Apart from that the replacement of petroleum vehicles by electric vehicles does not change anything as long as the electricity is mainly fossil, and if we have to rely on solar, I would like to know how we do to recharge the vehicles at night ... ????
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
eclectron
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2922
Registration: 21/06/16, 15:22
x 397

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by eclectron » 28/02/21, 19:28

ABC2019 wrote:
eclectron wrote:And I can predict his response from disinformation and liberal denial.

droughts did not exist before global warming?

: Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
And I can predict his response from disinformation and liberal denial.

Well, I'm not interested in ping pong with a pierced brain.
I can write the whole exchange in advance and it bothers me in advance ...
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
eclectron
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2922
Registration: 21/06/16, 15:22
x 397

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by eclectron » 28/02/21, 19:35

ABC2019 wrote:
ENERC wrote:It smells scorched for the last defenders of all oil / coal / gas :)

If you speak for me, I'm not defending anything at all, I just said that if we can replace them, it will happen naturally.

We will never be able to do it as easily as it is today.
each passing day makes the transition more difficult.
Gain height, the Nozzle ....
and for C I wouldn't want to be insulting. : Mrgreen:

Today the problem is purely financial and ideological (TINA, capitalism)
Tomorrow it will be in addition in resources.
0 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: No scientific consensus on climate change




by ABC2019 » 28/02/21, 19:49

eclectron wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:
ENERC wrote:It smells scorched for the last defenders of all oil / coal / gas :)

If you speak for me, I'm not defending anything at all, I just said that if we can replace them, it will happen naturally.

We will never be able to do it as easily as it is today.
each passing day makes the transition more difficult.

I don't really see why ... in addition, the more we wait, the more techniques improve, for example wind turbines or solar panels are much more efficient now than 20 years ago (obviously that does not solve the problems of intermittent).
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)

Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 230 guests