humus wrote:ABC2019 wrote:that's what I was saying, it's by saying everything and its opposite that we are sure to be right ...
On what I have just stated above, you are intellectually dishonest, as very often, not to say as always.
At least that doesn't change, so if I follow your logic you are always wrong, since you always say the same thing.
(reasoning knowingly perverted in the image of yours)
dishonesty is making accusations without justifying them. I said that climatologists announced in 2000 that there would soon be no more snow in Europe, and in 2020 that there would be a lot more. I put the sources in front of you, it's written in black and white. And am I the one who is dishonest?
it is you who finish discrediting yourself by refusing to recognize the evidence that is put in front of you, you prove that your convictions are purely ideological and not based on facts, like the mistrust that you express next to vaccines - your mode of operation is clear, like that of your friends: if that leads to accusing capitalist society, it is right, if not, it is wrong. So CR is fair because it leads to accusation of capitalist society, and vaccines are dangerous because it leads to accusation of capitalist society. CQFD.
It's just not science, it's ideology.
And of course, since you only operate like that, you interpret everything that is said against you as proof that you are ideologically on the other side, because you only know how to reason like that. Whether you can just rely on the existence of facts, regardless of any political considerations, is completely beyond you. It is outside of your mental functioning.
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)