Gulf Stream, the Achilles heel of the climate

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(What not to read as bullshit ... )

[izentrop]

(What not to read as bullshit ... )

+1
His Eminence has indeed spoken and continues to discredit himself by gulping bulga with wrong personal judgment.

ABC: The "quest for recognition" is obtained by the title or awards such as "agricultural merit", some "professors" use it to utter false information taken from the hat, but a scientific publication needs to be " validated by his peers ", from the BA BA ... well everyone understood except you

[ABC2019]

(What not to read as bullshit ... )

+1
His Eminence has indeed spoken and continues to discredit himself by gulping bulga with wrong personal judgment.

ABC: The "quest for recognition" is obtained by the title or awards such as "agricultural merit", some "professors" use it to utter false information taken from the hat, but a scientific publication needs to be " validated by his peers ", from the BA BA ... well everyone understood except you

obviously you do not know the scientific community well ...
validating a post absolutely does not mean that it is fair. Objective analyzes of the scientific content of publications show that approximately 90% of published results contain errors or are completely false. It is not very serious, what is interesting, it is to offer material for discussion, not necessarily to be fair. But this should not be taken as a criterion of truth - moreover all the publications you quote contradict previous publications!

And to have the money to do your research, I repeat that it is interesting to scare.

[izentrop]

all the posts you cite contradict previous posts!

No, they confirm them by providing more details. Get out of your dogma

[ABC2019]

ah yes of course, we were told repeatedly that we were going to have warmer winters and the disappearance of snow in Western Europe

http://www.globalwarming.org/2010/12/27 ... -the-past/

we confirm by providing more details, in fact no it will be colder with more snow !!!

well finally, an obvious advantage to say everything and its opposite, is that we can always say afterwards "we told you!"

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(And Bozo to try to make us believe that we have not found new mechanisms, new explanations for paradoxical phenomena due to the knowledge acquired recently and that climatology would necessarily be frozen like certain parts of the exact sciences ... licensed crook!)

[ABC2019]

(And Bozo to try to make us believe that we have not found new mechanisms, new explanations for paradoxical phenomena due to the knowledge acquired recently and that climatology would necessarily be frozen like certain parts of the exact sciences ... licensed crook!)

well no it's Izzy who said that climatology never contradicts itself, I just said on the contrary that it is not because something was published at the moment that it was correct. Lack of reading comprehension, Guignoldebois?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(And Bozo to insist who takes the opportunity to hit Izy while he himself denies almost everything that can be analyzed today in climatology, adding that it is urgent to do nothing ...)

[ABC2019]

(And Bozo to insist who takes the opportunity to hit Izy while he himself denies almost everything that can be analyzed today in climatology, adding that it is urgent to do nothing ...)

bah no it's you typed on Izy guignoldebois !!!

and it makes me laugh that you who criticize everything in science, suddenly you bow down to climatologists, but we understand the reasons: everything that calls into question the Graaaan Kapiitaaaal is necessarily right, and otherwise it is necessarily wrong !

science made by Guignoldebois what ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(It is true that it is delicious! Bozo who interprets as he pleases and no matter how, who makes me say what I did not write, just to insinuate that "the other" does not understand anything, at the the opposite of Irma Bozo who is delirious with her crystal mold .... If this is "science" ... )