Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?

Warming and Climate Change: causes, consequences, analysis ... Debate on CO2 and other greenhouse gas.
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by GuyGadebois » 27/02/20, 18:32

ABC2019 wrote:one more big journalistic dung, since the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...

Denying the obvious and unavoidable facts does not highlight you ...

.... Green in the spring, the algae that produce it turn orange during the summer and blush strongly in the winter. In doing so, they store heat that helps them withstand the cold. They then tend to decrease the albedo of the snow, therefore its ability to resist the heat of the sun. They also develop just when the temperature exceeds the melting point of snow. Nowadays, the temperature of glaciers and sea ice is increasing, often approaching the melting point. The algae then propagate and decrease the albedo of the snow, which absorbs more heat from the sun, which increases its fusion and therefore the propagation of algae. This is how the algae that terrified our ancestors could become a new nightmare. Besides, they have the nickname "the blood of glaciers" ....
https://www.pourlascience.fr/sr/histoir ... -17973.php
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by Exnihiloest » 27/02/20, 18:58

ABC2019 wrote:...
one more big journalistic dung, since the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...

and in art right now, it doesn't look sad either.
The Polarstern houses a scientific mission called Mosaic from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremen. It winters voluntarily on the Arctic pack ice (currently 150km from the North Pole). He should have been supplied by a Russian icebreaker, the Kapitan Dranitsyn.
(It was already supplied in this way around mid-December: https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arcti ... earch-ship )

Things are not going as planned. The Kapitan Dranitsyn has been underway for 4 weeks. But this year, the ice is much thicker than expected (1,6m) and the icebreaker is unable to progress.
The Polarstern awaits the relief of a hundred scientists and supplies. An alternative is refueling by helicopter, but currently the conditions are not met for air navigation either.
It is really a shame that the art does not obey the orders of the IPCC!

https://www.bccourier.com/there-is-unce ... olarstern/
https://follow.mosaic-expedition.org/
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by GuyGadebois » 27/02/20, 19:04

Exnihiloest wrote:The Polarstern ...
Things are not going as planned. The ...
It is really a shame that the art does not obey the orders of the IPCC!

Once again the dishonesty slung. Taking an epiphenomenon contradicted by ALL the surveys carried out for 50 years, Super Menteur makes it a golden rule. Except that it is of course false and that it does not deceive anyone:


In July 2019, Greenland lost 197 gigatons of surface ice, the equivalent of 80 million Olympic swimming pools. A straw.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
ENERC
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 725
Registration: 06/02/17, 15:25
x 255

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by ENERC » 27/02/20, 19:40

and in art right now, it doesn't look sad either.
The Polarstern houses a scientific mission called Mosaic from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremen. It winters voluntarily on the Arctic pack ice (currently 150km from the North Pole). He should have been supplied by a Russian icebreaker, the Kapitan Dranitsyn.


Hey Sunflower, I have the solution: move this ice from the Arctic (and not the Arctic) to the Pyrenees by helicopter.

Image

It is impeccable for business and finance. The planet doesn't care. After me the flood.

These climate-skeptical comments that fill this forum don't do anything to me anymore. It comes from the old people who stayed in the previous millennium.
Image
Young people have turned the page on this subject.
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by GuyGadebois » 27/02/20, 19:40

ABC2019 wrote:one more big journalistic dung, since the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...

But of course, which does not prevent the ice cream from melting:
https://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2014-m ... e-20190701
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by izentrop » 27/02/20, 20:08

ABC2019 wrote:... the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...
Yes this is it : Twisted:
Temperature record: melting ice in Antarctica is obvious in this image https://www.numerama.com/sciences/60739 ... image.html
NASA has released photos of this heat wave. They show a part called Eagle Island, below. On the left, an image dated February 4, 2020. On the right, we are a few days later, on February 13.

Image
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by ABC2019 » 27/02/20, 20:23

izentrop wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:... the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...
Yes this is it : Twisted:
Temperature record: melting ice in Antarctica is obvious in this image https://www.numerama.com/sciences/60739 ... image.html
NASA has released photos of this heat wave. They show a part called Eagle Island, below. On the left, an image dated February 4, 2020. On the right, we are a few days later, on February 13.

Image


and how does this contradict the fact that the trend is towards cooling?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by ABC2019 » 27/02/20, 20:25

GuyGadebois wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:one more big journalistic dung, since the current trend in the Antarctic Peninsula is at refroidissement ...

But of course, which does not prevent the ice cream from melting:
https://www.lefigaro.fr/sciences/2014-m ... e-20190701


and if it is due to warming, why did the ice pack increase before 2014 then?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by GuyGadebois » 27/02/20, 20:42

ABC2019 wrote:?

! <<< Answer to the con for a question to the con
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Global warming: natural variability vs anthropogenic influence?




by Exnihiloest » 27/02/20, 21:13

ENERC wrote:
and in art right now, it doesn't look sad either.
The Polarstern houses a scientific mission called Mosaic from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremen. It winters voluntarily on the Arctic pack ice (currently 150km from the North Pole). He should have been supplied by a Russian icebreaker, the Kapitan Dranitsyn.


Hey Sunflower, I have the solution: move this ice from the Arctic (and not the Arctic) to the Pyrenees by helicopter.

Very good idea but did you make the CO2 assessment of the operation?

These climate-skeptical comments that fill this forum don't do anything to me anymore. It comes from the old people who stayed in the previous millennium.
Image
Young people have turned the page on this subject.


"Youth are exalted and over-valued to the point of becoming an obligatory role model. Only those who are "young and dynamic" are taken seriously. Youthism can result in forms of discrimination in favor of young people to the detriment of the oldest."
http://www.toupie.org/Dictionnaire/Jeunisme.htm

Young people are the ones who are the most rolled in flour, we saw it with Greta Thunberg completely manipulated by her father. As for the others ...

Image
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 140 guests