When these "anecdotal" cases concern the most prominent personalities, and who most embody the values of protecting the planet for the general public, we can still assume * that it actually concerns many more people, and therefore that it is in no way "anecdotal", but on the contrary constitutive of everyone ...
Obviously abusive inference, since the "most prominent personalities" are so precisely because, out of mimetic desire, they eagerly seek social recognition far above the average, both material and symbolic.
As for the spectacular incarnation of the values of protecting the planet (sic!), We can rightly understand that these are only derivative processes to neutralize public opinion and secretly operate a manipulative catharsis.
* It is me who underlines ...