ENERC wrote:
I continue?????
We can clearly see that it is not tenable outside a major crisis (in clear collapse)
You do not continue since your conclusion is "We can see that this is not sustainable except for a major crisis".
ENERC wrote:
I continue?????
We can clearly see that it is not tenable outside a major crisis (in clear collapse)
ENERC wrote:To get there, here is a ladle scenario:
(...)
I continue?????
We can clearly see that it is not tenable outside a major crisis (in clear collapse)
But you are basing yourself on which scientific methodology or publication?
0 x
Christophe wrote:Bin see..C in the air yesterday speaks of "Life-size test" on pollution ...
It is an excellent episode which goes well around the question as I like !!
https://www.france.tv/france-5/c-dans-l ... l-air.html
And when we know that there are almost 8 million deaths from pollution per year "completely ignored" ... blocking the economy for a few hundred thousand potential deaths STRONGLY supports the hypothesis of Voluntary TEST !
And when we know that there are almost 8 million deaths from pollution per year "completely ignored" ... blocking the economy for a few hundred thousand potential deaths STRONGLY supports the hypothesis of Voluntary TEST !
It's true, I agree, if 100% of humanity catches it with 2% mortality it makes 7 * 000% = 2 million dead!
Source https://www.worldometers.info/coronavir ... try/italy/Italy: the real number of COVID-19 cases in the country could be 5,000,0000 (compared to the 119,827 confirmed ones) according to a study which polled people with symptoms who have not been tested, and up to 10,000,000 or even 20,0000,000 , XNUMX after taking into account asymptomatic cases, according to Carlo La Vecchia, a Professor of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology at the Statale di Milano University.
This number would still be insufficient to reach herd immunity, which would require 2/3 of the population (about 40,000,000 people in Italy) having contracted the virus [source].
The number of deaths could also be underestimated by 3/4 (in Italy as well as in other countries) [source], meaning that the real number of deaths in Italy could be around 60,000.
If these estimates were true, the mortality rate from COVID-19 would be much lower (around 25 times less) than the case fatality rate based solely on laboratory-confirmed cases and deaths, since it would be underestimating cases (the denominator) by a factor of about 1/100 and deaths by a factor of 1/4.
ENERC wrote:Clearly the probable mortality is 25 weaker.
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 130 guests