GuyGadebois wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:...
Free affirmation. If I wallowed, you would be unable to notice.
Missed. This is not what should be remembered, but the demo:
Obviously it's ladle.
"We establish an artificial, three-dimensional mesh of the medium that we want to model (for example: atmosphere) we virtually divide the geographical area into meshes of several kilometers per side. The size of the mesh will condition the computing time.
We solve the equations inside each box to determine some parameters considered characteristic for the system as a whole. This can include average temperature and its distribution, seasonal precipitation, average humidity, vegetation cover, wind speed and direction, etc.
We program all of this mathematical model, in computer language. "
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modèle_climatiqueNot only are there uncertainties on the raw data, but the raw data are processed before being used for the input parameters, and the evolutions being more or less chaotic, the parts of variations in input ultimately result in polar climates (quickly eliminated), or tropical. Even the cycle of clouds and rain is barely outlined in the IPCC models. And all the programming and the choice of parameters are made according to the prejudices that we already have on the climate since climatology is not a hard science. Ladle and twitch.
You always have to talk outside of your areas of competence, which you suddenly wonder, which they are.