Hello,
But a few years ago, Dikpati realized that the key to the mystery lay in some sort of conveyor belt on the surface of the Sun. [...] Here, what is transported is ionized gas, that is to say electrically charged. It flows in a loop from the equator to the solar poles and so on. Just as the great ocean conveyor belt conditions the climate on Earth, its solar equivalent would be the key to "solar weather".
Funny as the terms are chosen: we speak of ocean current, but never of electric current, and yet what is an "ion flow"? Quite in tune with a recent reading: the theory of
"the electric universe"The universe can be shown to consist almost entirely of electrically active plasma. The electric force is 39 orders of magnitude greater than gravity. [^ 10 39]
Roughly a purely mechanistic approach to space, not taking into account the electrical interactions is doomed to failure. This is also my point of view on the Pantone phenomenon
Plasma cosmology does not require mathematical inventions, such as the Big Bang, dark matter, dark energy, and black holes.
My favorite extract:
As gravitation-oriented astronomers are familiar with moving masses, they rarely think about charges. What is not familiar, which has no conceptual framework for understanding, is often not even perceived. So :
they think of moving the charged particles of the Sun as a "wind" instead of an electric current.
They think of charged particles falling on a planet or a moon as a "rain" instead of an electric shock.
They think of charged particles moving along magnetic fields as "jets" instead of a field aligned on an electric cable.
They think of abrupt changes in density and velocity of charged particles as a "frontal shock" instead of a double layer that can absorb electrical energy and even explode.
They can not see the forest of electrical particles hidden by trees from the mass of particles. They are lost in a plasma universe, seeing charged particles in motion but thinking in terms of gas kinetics and gravitation.
It took a while for Galileo's vision to prevail, how long will it take for guys like Alton Harp to be rehabilitated? This researcher was denied access to any laboratory for blaspheming against the big bang, compromising clichés in support.
(See towards the middle of the list of "heretics")Halton Arp wrote:It is often better not to know something wrong than to know a lot of things right.
An unproven hypothesis disguised as a known fact will predispose a scientist to conceal any evidence to the contrary or to hide it behind a muddle of conjectures.
Slightly HS, but it's too good!