ah thank you Christophe for the video, a lot of laughs !!!
1'32: "One ° C in 100 years ..
and then after several ° C in a few decades"---> wtf?
it is very strong, to respond to a criticism of unjustified extrapolation ... by repeating the unjustified extrapolation, that is rigor of reasoning!
1'43: the climate has been stable for 10 years ... wtf?
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpluvial_néolithique2'12: you just arrived, it was the traffic problems in Paris ... wtf?
he takes his car when there is a metro in Paris? 3'00: if there are a few hundred thousand humans at the end of the century ... wtf?
https://www.lepoint.fr/postillon/tribun ... 7_3961.php “While many species are threatened with extinction,” said Ken Caldeira of Stanford, “climate change does not threaten human extinction… I wouldn't want people to be motivated to do what we do. you have to make them believe something that is wrong. ". I asked Australian climatologist Tom Wigley what he thought of the claim that climate change threatens civilization. “It really bothers me because it's wrong,” he said. " All these young people have been misinformed. And that's partly Greta Thunberg's fault. Not on purpose. But she is wrong. But don't scientists and activists need to exaggerate to gain public attention? “I remember what Steve Schneider, a Stanford University climatologist, said,” Wigley replied. “He used to say that as a scientist we don't really have to worry about how we present things in our communications with people on the street who need a little push to realize that the problem is serious. Steve had no qualms about speaking in this biased way. I don't quite agree with that. "
the other completely silly thing is that if humanity had only a few hundred thousand individuals in 2100, that means that it would have started to decrease long before, and the emissions with inevitably, and therefore we cannot reach several ° C ... so there is no reason for it to go away. It is all perfectly incoherent. The CO2 growth scenarios up to 2100 also assume a global GDP multiplied by 5 or 10 at the end of the century, which is absolutely incompatible with an extinction of humanity.
3'47: "today it is not climate change which is the biggest problem for biodiversity, (thank you for recognizing it ..), but it will come ... wtf
? what allows him to say that? we'll never know, that's how it is, that's all.
4.10: what defines the tipping point is the irreversible side ... knowing that a large part is already irreversible uh so .. wtf?
is it already irreversible the quantity of CO2 that we put in the atmosphere, so we switched for a long time in fact, and we are not told anything?
5 17: the feedbacks cause a runaway which causes an exponential ... ah well sorry but not Mr. Ringenbach, a feedback that makes an amplification but not necessarily an exponential runaway, and no calculation has proved that this would be the case.
5.46: increase of 2 ° C -> increase of 13 m, then we do not know where the journalist comes from this, even Ringenbach does not understand "for the 2 ° C scenarios, we are rather over 1 meter" ... yes well, a factor of 13, we are not going to quibble eh ... well we feel a little embarrassed all the same on this one there to have to tell the journalist that he is saying anything.
7.42 the journalist: "the permafrost is over tens of km" "no, no, tens of cm", yes a factor of 100 we will not quibble eh ...
10'49: images of storms in Louisiana, floods in Reims, snow in Texas ... obviously all this never existed before it is well known !!
well I stopped there, I'm going to bed, but I had a good laugh!
...
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)