Behind a fight that seems fair, the IPCC and its donors are preparing a nightmare for us

[ABC2019]

Hello Mr Duplice,

You are now clearly displayed negationist, on the effects at least.

it's extraordinary that you call me a negationist while I quote respectable climatologists, member of the IPCC (Wigley and Emanuel) who just say that catastrophist speeches go too far !!

do you believe the scientists or the media?

So yes, today the extravagant climate is currently bearable, especially when strangers from Reims are flooded and permanently close their businesses, when Australian forests are burning etc.
This taste does not bother me!

except that you have no element to affirm that these events would not have taken place without the RC, and even less that they will disappear if we stop producing CO2. These events have ALWAYS existed, and they will ALWAYS exist - and no, to anticipate your answer, there is no evidence that they are more numerous because of CR.

The main part of the problems comes from the artificialization of the grounds for the floods, and of the construction of more and more numerous dwellings in the middle of the forests, which increase both the risk of fire and their consequences.

Whatever the emission scenario chosen, global warming is launched for the next 20 years.
To continue with coal is to put tokens back into the climate machine. Mr Duplice is a casino player.

The article reasons all other things being equal and does not take into account the depletions that will cut us off from the means of action to support an increasingly hot and extravagant climate.
Always so inconsistent and irresponsible, Mr. Duplice.
"you might be better in 2070" it can make sense. What seriousness can you expect from a casino player.

I said nothing about coal, you are responding to your imaginary ghosts, I quoted words from climatologists of the IPCC, who say that there is no extinction of humanity or collapse of society because of RC to fear, and you do not answer it. You only feed yourself to the media discourse that you drink in a loop.

[Janic]

a typical example of a zetetic obsession to say THE scientists rather than THE scientists.

I could have said "DES" scientists, indeed, but I absolutely do not see the connection between saying "the" or "of", and zetetics. Again your obsession that invades you on all subjects ...

I've pointed out many times that saying THE scientists is a misnomer, but you don't give a fuck, you and your funny guys!
for zetetics:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C3%A9t%C3%A9tique

Bloch is attributed abusively this name, to make a restrictive use of it and limited to his own beliefs, thus showing that he does not apply it to himself ... like you, his disciple.

With very rare exceptions, THE scientists do not agree between them since they put everything in the conditional. [*] For the ignard of service, this word apocalypse means revelation, that is to say an announcement of what will happen in the near or distant future, as the theory of relativity shows, between symbols and historicity.

I know what apocalypse means, we can even say etymologically that it means "unveiling", "revelation" being a similar Latin form instead of Greek, but the idea is to expose what is hidden.

Well there you go, well, you don't invent just anything and you then refer to its historical dimension ... that you have just looked for.

But it remains in the religious domain - not really surprising that this semantic field resurfaces for climate discussions.

According to YOUR distorting and distorted vision of what religion can be, a sign of your ignorance in this area too!
The revelations are precisely not of a religious type, but socio-historical since they concern human societies as a whole, whatever their beliefs or non-beliefs. just as when Einstein said I believe in a cosmic god, however, he does not go into religion.

On the other hand, on relativity, I dare not imagine what you are going to be able to get out for us.

.Especially do not imagine anything, you would fantasize sideways as usual.

[izentrop]

...get tired? I doubt it, "conclusive skepticism" is, intellectually speaking, extremely economical and leads to abuse ...

It worked on futura. His pleasure is confrontation.

[ABC2019]

a typical example of a zetetic obsession to say THE scientists rather than THE scientists.

I could have said "DES" scientists, indeed, but I absolutely do not see the connection between saying "the" or "of", and zetetics. Again your obsession that invades you on all subjects ...

I've pointed out many times that saying THE scientists is a misnomer, but you don't give a fuck, you and your funny guys!
for zetetics:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z%C3%A9t%C3%A9tique

Bloch is attributed abusively this name, to use it restrictively and limited to one's own beliefs

by speaking of beliefs, you show that you do not understand anything about the specificity of the scientific method, which discredits all your speeches that you hold on the subject. You pass science off as a belief because it's the only way of thinking you know, and you don't understand that there are others, hence your perpetual confusion.

Well there you go, well, you don't invent just anything and you then refer to its historical dimension ... that you have just looked for.

perfect example of the world that you constantly reinvent to satisfy your obsessions. You don't know anything about me, but you decree that I don't know the etymology of the word apocalypse, just to be able to think that I am stupid.

More

[Janic]

abcon

by speaking of beliefs, you show that you do not understand anything about the specificity of the scientific method,

no mon coco: to YOUR claim to own THE scientific method as if it belonged to someone or some sect.

which discredits all your speeches that you hold on the subject.

you are indeed twisted of the spirit: where did I hold a speech which discredits the science? Or? You can't say it obviously!

You pass science off as a belief because it's the only way of thinking you know, and you don't understand that there are others, hence your perpetual confusion.

if you had a minimum of thought you would know that you should not confuse de science with science, but obviously you shouldn't ask yourself too much.
A scientific claim is not science, but a claim only as you usually do by copying and pasting all the shit you can glean from Zététique company.

Janic wrote:

Well there you go, well, you don't invent just anything and you then refer to its historical dimension ... that you have just looked for.

perfect example of the world that you constantly reinvent to satisfy your obsessions. You don't know anything about me

Exactly what you do: you don't know anything about me

but you decree that I do not know the etymology of the word apocalypse,

not at all, you know it now that you just read it on the internet

just so I could think I'm dumb.

Mistake, I don't think you're dumb, you are from your successive prose, it is not a simple point of view, but an observation ... very, very scientific that goes without saying! that others tell you too!

[ABC2019]

abcon

by speaking of beliefs, you show that you do not understand anything about the specificity of the scientific method,

no mon coco: to YOUR claim to own THE scientific method as if it belonged to someone or some sect.

of course, your method which ends up concluding that the AFIS and the zeteticians are sects, it is surely the world standard.

After all, it suffices to redefine the meaning of the words "science", "sect", "religion", and like that one can say absolutely anything about anyone, only thing in which obviously you feel at the same time. 'easy.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Damn but as you ramble on ... AFIS, the convict Seppi and the lying zeteticians who have perverted "science" to make it a dogma, "we" have already given them their party, documents, proofs and testimonies to support ... It looks like a cock contest between helpless ... So you have nothing to say?

[ABC2019]

"We" have already given them their party, supporting documents, evidence and testimonies ...

who do we? Janic, Obamot, Guitounet, in short, the elite of world science and rigor embodied?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(Bozo does not know what "documents, proofs and testimonies" mean ... Wonderful piss trick ...)

[humus]

I said nothing about coal, you are responding to your imaginary ghosts, I quoted words from climatologists of the IPCC, who say that there is no extinction of humanity or collapse of society because of RC to fear, and you do not answer it. You only feed yourself to the media discourse that you drink in a loop.

The imaginary phantom is the excerpt from the very real article you cited.

At length of post you offer us the fallacious, the misguided and twisted reason, which borders on madness.
I will go to Izentrop's good advice and stop speaking to you.