Hello
I ask myself the following question
how the co² which is heavier than air: 1,5 times,
and which therefore flows like water on the ground
which therefore cannot rise in the air
how then can it reinforce a "greenhouse effect"?
co² and warming
- Capt_Maloche
- Moderator
- posts: 4559
- Registration: 29/07/06, 11:14
- Location: Ile-de-France
- x 42
Gases do not react like liquids
it is a phenomenon discovered by Mr. Dalton who gave his name to this law: Dalton's law http://plongee.amiral.free.fr/formation ... ltonn4.htm
we learn that in scuba diving courses
or how each gaseous compound will always tend to take up all the available volume
But it is true that the question may seem relevant, besides why do we say that ozone remains at altitude?
Because ozone is produced by UV, see: http://perso.orange.fr/michel.hubin/cap ... ozone1.htm
Just as the CO2 produced by human industries will tend to stagnate first near the ground before rising gently according to the winds and Dalton's law
it is a phenomenon discovered by Mr. Dalton who gave his name to this law: Dalton's law http://plongee.amiral.free.fr/formation ... ltonn4.htm
we learn that in scuba diving courses
or how each gaseous compound will always tend to take up all the available volume
But it is true that the question may seem relevant, besides why do we say that ozone remains at altitude?
Ozone is found in fairly high concentrations in the Earth's stratosphere, mainly at an altitude between 15 and 20 km. Ozone strongly absorbs ultraviolet rays, we speak of stratospheric ozone as being the "good ozone" because it protects us, and protects plants and animals, from UV radiation which would be fatal.
Because ozone is produced by UV, see: http://perso.orange.fr/michel.hubin/cap ... ozone1.htm
Just as the CO2 produced by human industries will tend to stagnate first near the ground before rising gently according to the winds and Dalton's law
0 x
"Consumption is similar to a search consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, the key, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increasing the environmental awareness." (Gérard Mermet)
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
I would have asked the question to my chemistry teacher but he got a little angry against us these days and I don't prefer to wake him up ... dsl
But it is true that a gas takes all the volume available to it ...
But what do you mean by "1,5 times heavier than air" since air is a mixture of gases? well, I believe.
Like what really should not quarrel with the teachers!
But it is true that a gas takes all the volume available to it ...
But what do you mean by "1,5 times heavier than air" since air is a mixture of gases? well, I believe.
Like what really should not quarrel with the teachers!
0 x
"I fear nothing, I hope for nothing, I am free" Nikos kazansakis
according to the calculations on the mass of co² on the planet
it would not represent more than 0,13 millimeter thick
and moreover it takes all the available space on the ground to need it to go up for lack of space the other gases being more volatile than him
the air is composed of nitrogen o² aron co²
Nitrogen (N2) 78,09%
Oxygen (O2) 20,95%
Argon (A) 0,93%
Carbon dioxide (CO2) 0,035%
http://www.educnet.education.fr/obter/appliped/circula/theme/atmos22.htm
co² is heavier than o² and nitrogen
it would not represent more than 0,13 millimeter thick
and moreover it takes all the available space on the ground to need it to go up for lack of space the other gases being more volatile than him
the air is composed of nitrogen o² aron co²
Nitrogen (N2) 78,09%
Oxygen (O2) 20,95%
Argon (A) 0,93%
Carbon dioxide (CO2) 0,035%
http://www.educnet.education.fr/obter/appliped/circula/theme/atmos22.htm
co² is heavier than o² and nitrogen
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79330
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11046
I am in contact with a person who defends exactly the same thesis: CO2 is not responsible for the greenhouse effect.
Certainly, but then when we ask him: "Ok but then what makes the alpine glaciers melt" he answers "they melt from ... below"
It seems to me that I had already explained his thesis on forums...
For the 0.13 mm layer it is an absolute blank argument because it would be the same (or almost I have not checked your calculations) for the ozone layer if we put it at sea level. as much as it has no influence on the planet?
ps: https://www.econologie.com/forums/post53983.html#53983
Certainly, but then when we ask him: "Ok but then what makes the alpine glaciers melt" he answers "they melt from ... below"
It seems to me that I had already explained his thesis on forums...
For the 0.13 mm layer it is an absolute blank argument because it would be the same (or almost I have not checked your calculations) for the ozone layer if we put it at sea level. as much as it has no influence on the planet?
ps: https://www.econologie.com/forums/post53983.html#53983
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79330
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11046
Here I found the thesis of the guy in question, it starts in the middle of this page: https://www.econologie.com/forums/un-scienti ... t2883.html
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
I understood well even by reading everything
how the greenhouse effect works
and is the 0,005% co² density sufficient while it is established that it is not aloft, to raise the temperature?
a greenhouse effect ca apour aim to prevent hot air from "blowing away"
the co² thus constituted a waterproof barrier of the ground? where is he most concentrated?
how the greenhouse effect works
and is the 0,005% co² density sufficient while it is established that it is not aloft, to raise the temperature?
a greenhouse effect ca apour aim to prevent hot air from "blowing away"
the co² thus constituted a waterproof barrier of the ground? where is he most concentrated?
0 x
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
It did absolutely nothing to do with that ...thejoker wrote:[...] a greenhouse effect ca apour aim to prevent hot air from "flying away"
the co² thus constituted a waterproof barrier of the ground? where is he most concentrated?
Go see on the post of the negationists (which it seems that you are part of ...) you will have answers to your questions.
For the 0.13 mm thick layer, it's really monstrous bullshit that would be fun if we didn't know that some people distill this type of information for the sole purpose of minimizing the responsibility of man in the spirit of vulgus-pecum...
Question: how does a balloon probe for example to measure CO2 in the middle of the atmosphere if it is supposed to stagnate on the ground?
0 x
"I am a big brute, but I rarely mistaken ..."
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 194 Replies
- 18900 views
-
Last message by Ahmed
View the latest post
30/11/23, 20:49A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
-
- 26 Replies
- 9449 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
06/02/22, 20:27A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
-
- 1 Replies
- 5423 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
09/12/20, 14:37A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
-
- 0 Replies
- 7133 views
-
Last message by Exnihiloest
View the latest post
07/12/20, 18:39A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
-
- 22 Replies
- 10451 views
-
Last message by GuyGadebois
View the latest post
13/03/20, 12:08A subject posted in the forum : Climate change: CO2, warming, greenhouse ...
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 210 guests