Climate and warming all know 105 minutes

[Christophe]

640 version * 480 up on:

a) Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oiBvfyYiyI (Yuck)
b) Daily: http://www.dailymotion.com/econologie/v ... ovici_tech (Rebeurk)

So surely you have to have a special status ("Moviemaker" style on Daily) to get high resolution.

Well the point is that the central slide is legible what is.

So I think you do not need to resize the video.

Edit I was right:

What is a MotionMaker?

A MotionMaker is a creative user who posts his personal creations on Dailymotion. As such, it must ensure and guarantee that its videos are his own creations, and contain no infringement of intellectual property rights of third parties (copyright ...).

Because of its status MotionMaker, it has specific tools that enable it to be identified as a creative user and increase the visibility of its videos: ability to customize his page, affix the Creative Content on signage its video and a MotionMaker logo associated with their profile, upload unlimited (in weight and time) best encoding (including HD).

It also has the ability to see his videos highlighted on the home page and on various promotional spaces Dailymotion.

Many creative talents and proved as MotionMakers.

http://www.dailymotion.com/faq#what_motionmaker

So Matt you can forget going to have to stay in "low" ...

Anyway I think that with the zip slides in addition it's good.

[Christophe]

I just joined the conference to the site:

a) Video: https://www.econologie.com/rechauffement ... -3863.html
b) Slides:
https://www.econologie.com/rechauffement ... -3864.html

You saw Matt, when it's integrated with a site, hardware acceleration is functional ... it does not improve the definition but smooth de-pixelate the video.

Really strange ...

[Matt113]

it's a shame because it's a video or quality is crucial to read the charts.

we still see when it's written big enough, the only thing we will not see are the graphics legends.

[Christophe]

Yeah but thanks to your slides ca ... compensates a bit ...

Otherwise need to find an equivalent to Ytube or daily which manages the HD ...?

[Capt_Maloche]

here is the links on google video of a video conference and slides

https://www.econologie.com/rechauffement ... -3863.html

I am disappointed by against the video has really lost as passing on google video, it's hard to read some graphics.

dailymotion should try on to see what happens but must cut video piece 20 minutes if I understand.

BEUARK! it's ugly, damage

[Capt_Maloche]

Say, you can not load it on your home server?
I think we could produce it in 500Mo

[Christophe]

No I do not I heberge streaming and more large files.

Maloche the original file is NICKEL is the internal conversion in daily or google video that disgusting everything.

Trying to find us a video hoster high définiton instead of bitching

[Matt113]

Yes that's the problem, capture is nickel, well not quite to my taste If I had know software that use files over 4 go without worries I would have made a record directly in uncompressed (1 go minute + or -) I have the right place.
What rotten everything is the re-encoding is done on the video sent.

edit: I read now on google video I think we could download the video in its original quality but I see no link for download and I have not seen this kind of option when I posted the video.

re edit: by searching, I found the options, the video is declared as free and free so it is supposed to be downloadable, in the help of google video he says to use the dropdown menu to the right of the video for the download, I saw nothing in any case.
Parcontre to earn some quality but lose in size, if you click on the button at the bottom right of the video and you select Normal, the video will be displayed in the resolution used by so google video not Raster has the extension

[Capt_Maloche]

a little reminder of the primary link http://storage02.brainsonic.com/custome ... index.html

Toff, I propose the complete file of this quality
example in this quality = 1mn for 1.35Mo: HERE
Either 160Mo total

hmm?

[nonoLeRobot]

Why not leave a link to the original video. Because the only advantage of youtube is that everyman has good view but if it's a video site to share, it's the same.