understanding injection water / doping motor-al-water-thermodynamic-t4883.html
DESIGNED AND PRODUCED BY YOUR SERVANT
The results of these tests are a drastic reduction of unburned (soot), a significant reduction in NOx, CO, and see an increase in yield heating-insulation / amelioration-burner-fuel-reduction-nox-and-co-Blue Flame-t5172-60.html # p81989
I remember that my goal is to reuse water from the combustion of fuel oil to reduce unburned specific to this type of boiler:
perfect combustion reaction GO (nitrogen is not present)
C2H16 34 + = 49 2 O32 CO2 + 34 H2O
Here is the Official Report of the mounting
The fuel being sprayed liquid, many droplets are not completely burned, or poorly, hence the large amount of soot generated by oil burners in general. more the high temperature of the flame (1800 ° C) alot product NOx.
The principle used is that of the "blue flame" burner:
GOAL REACHED April 19 2008, (See page 4)
RESULTS ACHIEVED WITH PHOTO BELOW € 8 equipment (1 new nozzle)
YOU WILL FIND BELOW THE INSTRUCTIONS, FORT PLAIN, MOUNTING:
SUMMARY: to transform a traditional burner blue flame burner:
- Reduce its nozzle sizes 2 or more if we want to increase the efficiency of the boiler (60 ° angle) and also limit T ° of smoke in 130 ° C max.
- Building the induction tube sheet or another from the template posted below and mount it back on the burner tube
- Reverse the hook bottom flame to increase the blowing pressure
- Increase the pressure of the oil pump
- Adjust the air flow for a T ° exceeds flame 950 ° C and less than 1300 ° C
Flame T ° lower than 950 ° C: CO production
T ° isupérieure flame 1300 ° C: NOx production
THERE MUST BE A MEASURING DEVICE CO
That's all !! and it gives this:
LOWERING THE FLAME T °,
- ALMOST MORE DRASTIC REDUCTION AND unburned SOOT
- INCREASE OF TRADE IN THE FIREPLACE BOILER
- IMPROVING THE COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY AND THUS SAVING FUEL
- KNOWN REDUCTION CO and NOx POLUANTS
CO divided by 9 !!
Zero VOC = 0 !!
NOx divided by 20 !!
AND MORE, CA CLEAN THE BOILER
Exactly as do the industrial by injecting water vapor.
CHECK MEASUREMENT RESULTS HERE : heating-insulation / amelioration-burner-fuel-reduction-nox-and-co-Blue Flame-t5172-60.html # p81989
Photo mounting the tube sheet on the burner, simple right? (Grime is when my loose provisional assembly fell to the burner head )
Developed the tube sheet:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment of the "flame grip"
Here is a traditional burner head (thank you Loulou)
Red the burner tube, noted in conical end
In blue "the flame hook"
The movement of the head (including the flame holder, nozzle, electrodes ...) in the burner tube changes the air pressure before the flame holder, and to spend more or less air through the fins of the flame holder.
- Forward: + pressure, flame shorter and turbulence (what we want)
- Back - pressure, flame longer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPLANATION:
the combustion of oil products are mainly CO2 and water vapor
RECALL:
perfect combustion reaction GO (nitrogen is not present)
C2H16 34 + = 49 2 O32 CO2 + 34 H2O
The recirculation of exhaust gas allows:
- Firstly the flame temperature reduction below the threshold of 1300 ° C to no longer produce NOx
- Secondly, an increase in mixing rate (mixture) fuel / oxidant in the heart of the flame
- Free injection of water vapor from the combustion of fuel oil in the heart of the flame for the reactions below.
- the following reaction which explains the reduction of CO in the gas phase according to the reversible equation: CO + H2O <> CO2 + H2
- The following reaction which allows the elimination of soot particles, the "water gas" which is a synthesis gas produced by the action of water on carbon (carbon) or incandescent coke: H2O + C = H2 + CO
- A little bit (Minimal) of pyrolysis, steam begins its thermal decomposition (pyrolysis water) from 800 ° C: 2H²O + Energy = 2H² + O²
The temperature of the flame is not homogeneous, hotter in the center and more and more "cold" towards the outside, the "average temperature measured" on the assembly is 1000 ° C with an estimated maximum of 1600 ° C in the center (yellow flame, hence the few ppm of NOx measured) and a minimum below 900 ° C in the boundary layer (hence the few ppm of CO measured)
Edit the Capt_Maloche 09 / 06 / 2009
Now I'm here for the steam injection:
perfect combustion reaction GO (nitrogen is not present)
C2H16 34 + = 49 2 O32 CO2 + 34 H2O
adding water vapor first (Important) of the combustion cycle spectacular pollution
in fact it is these two arch-known reactions that explain these results:
H2O + C = CO + H2 : the incandescent soot particles (the "bad burns") react with the water vapor, this requires a temperature above 950 ° C and if possible below 1300 ° C, hence the difficulties encountered by our amateur testers on all these systems
CO + H2O <> CO2 + H2 : CO from the first reaction and imperfect combustion reacts with steam to supply hydrogen; as the T ° must be greater than 950 ° C otherwise there will be excess CO
H2+2O2<>2H2O : Hydrogen produced by the first two reactions contributes to the reaction of unburnt, to maintain the explosion longer and thus increase the yield.
Basically, unburned are converted into energy before becoming
IMPORTANT NOTE:
the fact is also that, as the water vapor is injected at the start of the combustion cycle, the available C which has not yet reacted (and which would have reacted in the normal cycle) to the "choice", which allows the water vapor already present to act according to the first reaction
the advantage is also that the CO thus produced during the reaction is immediately transformed from the second equation !!
where mounting allows re maximum circulation,
where unburned are traditionally produced on traditional oil burner flame
On CO:
CO:
Here this undesirable gas resulting from the combustion of carbonaceous material under conditions
Specific incomplete combustion. Oxygenation of the home is insufficient to burn
completely the gas formed from the material, but the reaction is quite exothermic
to raise and maintain the temperature above 950 ° C. Carbon monoxide is formed
then preferably carbon dioxide, according to the Boudouard reaction.
The variation of this standard reaction enthalpy Delta 298 K is r H ° = 172,3 1-kJ.mol
This reaction is endothermic, it is favored by an increase in
temperature
metastability below 950 ° C
an excess of exhaust gas recirculation (CO2 H2O +) causes a decrease in T ° of the flame below 950 ° C prophetic
We must therefore address this type of burner depending on the temp of the flame, or with a measuring CO and NOx
greater than 950 ° C and less than 1300 ° C
Flame T ° lower than 950 ° C: CO production
T ° isupérieure flame 1300 ° C: NOx production
INFO:
REGISTERED TO PROCESS INPI June 2008
P. MALOCHET
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST FIRST
here's what I tinkered ago 15 days 2h00 on my oil burner with a single sheet, My tube and adapted in diameter and made 80mm along 22cm overall:
Below is the draft of my first cut, not enough induction
T ° of operation equal (water 60 ° C) and my settings unchanged smoke rose from 110 120 ° C to ° C (meaning more energy and certainly less unburned) and my flame is now extremely light (much more than before), the metal tube becomes red (after a few seconds, sheet 10 / 10ème forces) because the combustion of the mixture starts at the tube air inlets (the flame holder right after the gills that j 'I practiced) makes louvers tube is completely open at its base and stands by 4 legs 10mm
Just after stopping the burner:
The flame still out 20 good centimeters after the tube which means that the droplets are far from being sprayed all the inner
By dint of blush, the sheet disintegrated, but only on the left side ... it will take me another material that resists 900 ° C in time
I'll reiterate a model for much of induction by doubling the surface of the tube or 113mm, like this:
I'll back the flame holder to generate a shorter flame
I try to do that in the week may be tonight
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Another way to complement the assembly above, preheating the oil, which does not seem to be the best solution to remove unburned particles