Climate change: the Amazon rainforest emits CO2 instead of absorbing it
https://www-lavoixdunord-fr.cdn.ampproj ... n-absorber
Climate change: the Amazon rainforest emits CO2 instead of absorbing it
the IPCC announced them in 1990, recalls Jean-Pascal Van Ypersele https://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail ... d=10804972Christophe wrote:Yesterday in Belgium:
izentrop wrote: the IPCC announced them in 1990, recalls Jean-Pascal Van Ypersele https://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail ... d=10804972
Climate: Natural disasters, related to water to be expected
According to Prakash Luchun, for Mauritius, January 1 begins with the sign of Cancer, which is the birth ascendant of our country.
“The sign of Cancer is related to the element of water. For the year 2021, not only Mauritius, but various countries of the world will be terribly affected by natural disasters, particularly related to water. "
izentrop wrote: the IPCC announced them in 1990, recalls Jean-Pascal Van Ypersele https://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail ... d=10804972
ABC2019 wrote: but do you think it has been particularly hot in recent weeks in Europe?
Ahmed wrote:Rain generally results * in our latitudes from the meeting between a warm (and therefore humid) front and a cold front which condenses this humidity. The cold "drop" plays this role here.
According to the Météo-France forecaster interviewed by 20 Minutes, Jerome Lecou : "When on the surface (the first hundreds of meters of the atmosphere), the conditions are rather warm and there is an overhanging phase of cold air ranges which circulate around 4.000 / 5.000 meters, you have an unstable profile absolutely favorable to the formation of convective clouds, cumulonimbus clouds, storm clouds. "
The movements of air masses (often complex) constitute a major mechanism of energy dissipation in the "thermal machine" Earth ...
* Or the cooling of a mass of hot and humid air which rises in altitude (case of the tropical climate).
Ahmed wrote:I do not understand the objection: the fact that the cold "drop" is in one place or another is only due to the complexity of the air currents. On the other hand, if a lot of water can fall, it is because it is contained in air masses hot enough for this to be possible ...
ABC2019 wrote:Ahmed wrote:I do not understand the objection: the fact that the cold "drop" is in one place or another is only due to the complexity of the air currents. On the other hand, if a lot of water can fall, it is because it is contained in air masses hot enough for this to be possible ...
we agree, but did the particularly strong floods that happened come from the fact that the air in contact with the cold drop was much warmer than before and contained more water? I don't have that impression, from what I heard, it just came from the fact that the chance of the currents and the pressure distribution caused the precipitation to stay in one place for hours. Bad luck for those below, but it could have happened just as well 30 or 50 years ago.
And obviously, the damage is also due to the fact that urbanization has caused more and more houses to be built on land previously agricultural or wooded, which absorbed water, and which we avoided before building in the major bed of rivers.
Back to "Climate Change: CO2, warming, greenhouse effect ..."
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 101 guests