The latest figures and weather consequences of global warming

[Exnihiloest]

...
This video, designed in collaboration with Rodolphe Meyer [] presents some of the most problematic consequences of climate change and helps to understand why it is a major challenge of the XNUMXst century ...

This fiction is not worth the Netflix SF series, which are much more exciting and much more believable.

[Exnihiloest]

44 ° C expected in Spain ... the covid will take a slap! It's already that !

[i] Heat wave: up to 44 ° C expected in Spain
...

It will compensate for this winter. Absolute cold record beaten in Spain:
https://www.lindependant.fr/2021/01/06/ ... 295195.php

and in France too: "The most severe cold period for at least thirty years"
https://www.meteoconsult.fr/actualites- ... d-ce-matin

in Holland too: "The Netherlands hit by their first snowstorm in ten years"
https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/2971555- ... ige-10-ans

and in the USA too: "A historic cold wave in the United States"
https://www.lemonde.fr/international/ar ... _3210.html

USA where the cold now seems a habit: "Snow in Florida, unheard of in 29 years"
https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/mond ... f5f32a34a0

Strange that we did not hear our ecologists on these shots ...

This is where we can clearly see that the thesis of anthropogenic global warming is not scientific: like religious theses, it is irrefutable in Popper's sense:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9futabilit%C3%A9

What objective criteria would the proponents of the anthropogenic global warming IPCCien thesis accept to recognize that there is not such warming as they describe it?
If there are no answers to this question, it is because we are dealing with a non-scientific thesis.

And I don't see any response. Even a cold wave is now held to be due to a climatic "disruption" (when there has never been a "regulation"). Apocalyptic anthropogenic warming has become a dogma of ecological religion.

[gildas]

If there are records of heat and cold that are broken every year, the burnt forests are not coming back anytime soon!
On the other hand, the jussie brings a remarkable regreening of the planet!

[Exnihiloest]

If there are records of heat and cold that are broken every year, the burnt forests are not coming back anytime soon!

except that it is not "global warming" that causes fires, but humans, whose living spaces have grown considerably over the past century, and here it is indeed anthropogenic. Add to this that environmentalists are actively involved in these fires: measures owed to them, such as brush clearance restrictions in the United States, preventing electricity companies from easily intervening when vegetation approaches high voltage lines, or l preventative fire ban in Australia make fires catastrophic.

On the other hand, the jussie brings a remarkable regreening of the planet!

What are you talking about ?

[gildas]

? It is the heat dome that caused the fires to start in Canada ...

For several days, western Canada has suffered an unprecedented heat wave, due to a "heat dome" phenomenon linked to global warming. In the village of Lytton, British Columbia, temperatures reached 49,6 ° C on Tuesday, an all-time high in the country. Accustomed to average temperatures of 30 ° C at this time of year, the inhabitants were evacuated when numerous fires broke out in and around the village.

"We are all in shock, the members of our community have lost everything." It is with these words that Edith Loring Kuhanga summed up her state of mind and that of the inhabitants of Lytton, Wednesday June 30, in a text posted on Facebook, while his city was reduced to ashes by the spontaneous fires caused by the "heat dome".

https://observers.france24.com/fr/am%C3 ... evacuation

But indeed if the forests decrease because of the humans there is less absorption of CO2 ...

The jussie is an invasive plant of the rivers .. (dsl for the hs)

[humus]

44 ° C expected in Spain ... the covid will take a slap! It's already that !

[i] Heat wave: up to 44 ° C expected in Spain
...

It will compensate for this winter. Absolute cold record beaten in Spain:
https://www.lindependant.fr/2021/01/06/ ... 295195.php

and in France too: "The most severe cold period for at least thirty years"
https://www.meteoconsult.fr/actualites- ... d-ce-matin

in Holland too: "The Netherlands hit by their first snowstorm in ten years"
https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/2971555- ... ige-10-ans

and in the USA too: "A historic cold wave in the United States"
https://www.lemonde.fr/international/ar ... _3210.html

USA where the cold now seems a habit: "Snow in Florida, unheard of in 29 years"
https://www.lesoleil.com/actualite/mond ... f5f32a34a0

Strange that we did not hear our ecologists on these shots ...

This is where we can clearly see that the thesis of anthropogenic global warming is not scientific: like religious theses, it is irrefutable in Popper's sense:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9futabilit%C3%A9

What objective criteria would the proponents of the anthropogenic global warming IPCCien thesis accept to recognize that there is not such warming as they describe it?
If there are no answers to this question, it is because we are dealing with a non-scientific thesis.

And I don't see any response. Even a cold wave is now held to be due to a climatic "disruption" (when there has never been a "regulation"). Apocalyptic anthropogenic warming has become a dogma of ecological religion.

Smoke strategy with pseudo-scientific data diverted to instill doubt and during this time, we continue to emit CO2.

All of this is a consequence of climate change.
Explanation in picture:

[Exnihiloest]

...
Explanation in picture:

Like pious images, big jokes to impress the non-thinking who confuses weather and climate and is unable to read and understand studies.

Still no response to:

What objective criteria would the proponents of the anthropogenic global warming IPCCien thesis accept to recognize that there is not such warming as they describe it?

So it's good that warming is a non-scientific thesis.

[humus]

...
Explanation in picture:

Like pious images, big jokes to impress the non-thinking who confuses weather and climate and is unable to read and understand studies.

Still no response to:
What objective criteria would the proponents of the anthropogenic global warming IPCCien thesis accept to recognize that there is not such warming as they describe it?

So it's good that warming is a non-scientific thesis.

Hilarious, it is precisely you who do not understand anything and do not especially try to do it.
Apart from throwing up, I did not see you bring relevant information anywhere, that being and given your behavior, same fate as ABC2019 ignored, and life will be more fluid.

[ENERC]

So it's good that warming is a non-scientific thesis.

MDR see PTR

[Christophe]

Yesterday in Belgium: