Tension with Russia in Ukraine
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28416
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5428
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
(jubilant yesterday, the 2 braggarts are there in "compulsive posting" mode: does he reveal their disappointment?)
0 x
Toxic more than ever: GuyGadebois
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 13032
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1409
- Contact :
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
For more than 20 years, he has organized the blocking of "all political opposition and almost all the media." towards his person.pedrodelavega wrote: "We know who we lose, we don't know who we win": Couldn't he be replaced by someone crazier than him?
This well-oiled mechanism, forged in the days of the KGB, would not necessarily work for another hardliner in the regime. The strings are too well known.
His madness could have been stopped long ago, with a real effective international policy of states and organizations: UN NATO Europe...
1 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28416
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5428
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
So these are the words of the 2 most stupid of the fo-fo, who don't think beyond the end of their noses.
On the one hand, they possibly militate for an interference which would consist in replacing the Russian president and on the contrary do not complain about the censorship and the ostracism exercised against Russia, and finally, they claim that it exercises "a well oiled"; while contradicting itself in the facts..!
Who banned Russian media in the west? (whose irreproachable journalistic work had been underlined by many Western journalists, more virtuous than others...)
Who muzzles information on social networks: US: Face-Book, Twitter, Youtube etc...? It's a lot of coffee!
Evidence? (Except candidates / mainstream in foreign pay CIA, Sorros etc)
You are having a real pathological fix, reinforced by the feeling that as flock of the macronist sect you feel invested with a "mission" of "info vigilante and mystifier" since you have screwed up for 3 years diligently, (and that you continue)
— you therefore admit that there is an opposition, since "not all"
— so you contradict yourself in the same sentence, and demonstrate the guange that reigns in what serves as your brain...
It is sure that our media aligned, have lessons of "probity"to display, they whose partiality in favor of Western positions, is constantly perpetuated through idiots like you (who have been the architects of the current war situation), to the point that the mainstream has been completely silent on the post-Maidan coup, and now exclusively binge on neo-Nazi propaganda!
And the most comical thing is that the two who defame about the "estremdroate", wonder (without contradicting each other) if the Russian Pdt could not be replaced by an 'ultra'
(while it's him they accuse of all the evils... you should know...)
On the one hand, they possibly militate for an interference which would consist in replacing the Russian president and on the contrary do not complain about the censorship and the ostracism exercised against Russia, and finally, they claim that it exercises "a well oiled"; while contradicting itself in the facts..!
Who banned Russian media in the west? (whose irreproachable journalistic work had been underlined by many Western journalists, more virtuous than others...)
Who muzzles information on social networks: US: Face-Book, Twitter, Youtube etc...? It's a lot of coffee!
Which ones?izentrop wrote:pedrodelavega wrote:1/ He still has control over all political opposition and almost all the media.
For more than 20 years, he has organized the blocking of "all political opposition and almost all the media." towards his person.
This well-oiled mechanism, forged in the days of the KGB, would not necessarily work for another hardliner in the regime. The strings are too well known.
Evidence? (Except candidates / mainstream in foreign pay CIA, Sorros etc)
it's been said for years... ah, are you finally waking up? I 'replaced a word in your remarks, because the "tare" delayed here, it's you... The other is not (even if I disapprove of going to war, I don't have all the elements to judge him...).pedrodelavega wrote:2/ "We know who we lose, we don't know who we win": Couldn't it be replaced by an [ultra]? Internally, in the dissatisfied, we hear a lot of the hard core of Russian nationalists.
You are having a real pathological fix, reinforced by the feeling that as flock of the macronist sect you feel invested with a "mission" of "info vigilante and mystifier" since you have screwed up for 3 years diligently, (and that you continue)
you just proved 2 things:izentrop wrote:pedrodelavega wrote:1/ He still has control over [•••] almost all the media.
He has been organizing the lockdown of [•••] for more than 20 years almost all of the media." towards his person.
— you therefore admit that there is an opposition, since "not all"
— so you contradict yourself in the same sentence, and demonstrate the guange that reigns in what serves as your brain...
The UN cannot in principle take a stand against belligerents, the "MAD" so it is YOU. Even if the position of the Secretary General is sometimes ambiguous (even at the level of international law) still happy that the organization is not working as you would like.izentrop wrote:[Media]
His madness could have been stopped long ago, with a real effective international policy of states and organizations: UN NATO Europe...
It is sure that our media aligned, have lessons of "probity"to display, they whose partiality in favor of Western positions, is constantly perpetuated through idiots like you (who have been the architects of the current war situation), to the point that the mainstream has been completely silent on the post-Maidan coup, and now exclusively binge on neo-Nazi propaganda!
And the most comical thing is that the two who defame about the "estremdroate", wonder (without contradicting each other) if the Russian Pdt could not be replaced by an 'ultra'

2 x
Toxic more than ever: GuyGadebois
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28416
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5428
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
The death toll of 66 victims was increased by 23 deaths.
0 x
Toxic more than ever: GuyGadebois
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1680
- Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
- x 751
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5291
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 630
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
Remundo wrote:he is undrinkable, wraps himself in the sheets of a zealous and superiorly intelligent moralist while he demonstrates the most perfect partiality and bad faith stamped with stupidity.
He has a serious problem with highly intelligent people, our censor. It complex.

1 x
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5291
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 630
Re: [Maybe one less pest] Tension with Russia in Ukraine
Pro-Putin fanatic Nikita Mikhalkov is hospitalized in serious condition due to Covid. This moron would he have listened to our antivax of the French extreme right and would not have been vaccinated?
He may avoid The Hague by joining the Bogdas. We wish him.
2 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28416
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5428
Re: Tension with Russia in Ukraine
And that's how you go from a post where you claim that others lack compassion, while you wish the death of a stove, intellectual, filmmaker the post after....
This is defamation of a moderator. I've never seen a difference in empathy here, towards one camp rather than another (except for the unconditional news who support the western clan close to the ukros-nazis, like you).
To say that Ukrainians are favored by Washington does not mean to be pro-Nazi. Ditto for the Russians, it's the result of your sophisticated cogitations without proof (not to say deliberately malicious)
Alas for you, it's abject and others see it and understand it.


This is defamation of a moderator. I've never seen a difference in empathy here, towards one camp rather than another (except for the unconditional news who support the western clan close to the ukros-nazis, like you).
To say that Ukrainians are favored by Washington does not mean to be pro-Nazi. Ditto for the Russians, it's the result of your sophisticated cogitations without proof (not to say deliberately malicious)
Alas for you, it's abject and others see it and understand it.
Last edited by Obamot the 05 / 01 / 23, 18: 36, 1 edited once.
1 x
Toxic more than ever: GuyGadebois
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 38 guests