ABC2019 wrote: And I doubt that almost 100% of these people could have been saved ...
Yet that is what the numbers indicate ... And then, stop rotting the topic, it's not the subject.
ABC2019 wrote: And I doubt that almost 100% of these people could have been saved ...
GuyGadebois wrote:ABC2019 wrote: And I doubt that almost 100% of these people could have been saved ...
Yet that is what the numbers indicate ... And then, stop rotting the topic, it's not the subject.
ABC2019 wrote:Obamot wrote:It's not wrong since 98% of people have nothing ...
except that I was not asking the percentage of sick people who get out of it, but the percentage of deaths that could have been avoided thanks to the HCQ, therefore calculated only on the 0,5 to 1% who do not survive it . And I doubt that almost 100% of these people could have been saved ...
ABC2019 wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:ABC2019 wrote: And I doubt that almost 100% of these people could have been saved ...
Yet that is what the numbers indicate ... And then, stop rotting the topic, it's not the subject.
But of course, Mr HCQ practically 100%, that's what the numbers indicate ... go take a little AZT and then you will go to bed.
ABC2019 wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:The last post of ABC is nothing less than neo colonialism. Tell me, who do you think you are to speak for them?
Bah eclectron speaks on behalf of the whole of humanity by wanting to impose its own point of view on it, that's hypercolonialism !!
note that I take his point of view, I did not say that it is the point of view that I advocated me: I just ask why with his principles he does not rather choose to base his company on the EnR rather than nuclear, and why not share it with everyone!
eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:The last post of ABC is nothing less than neo colonialism. Tell me, who do you think you are to speak for them?
Bah eclectron speaks on behalf of the whole of humanity by wanting to impose its own point of view on it, that's hypercolonialism !!
note that I take his point of view, I did not say that it is the point of view that I advocated me: I just ask why with his principles he does not rather choose to base his company on the EnR rather than nuclear, and why not share it with everyone!
Anything for hypercolonialism ... knowing that I advocate direct democracy.
To expose one's ideas is not to impose them.
and for the rest I have answered you many times why nuclear power rather than renewable energies, even if it does not please anyone, not even me.
ABC2019 wrote:and you therefore expect that direct democracy, applied to the whole world, will make everyone converge towards exactly the same point of view on the "good" way of life, which happens by chance to be the one which corresponds exactly to the lifestyle that you imagine to be ideal for your average Westerner, accustomed to its comfort, and not wanting to lose it?
eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:and you therefore expect that direct democracy, applied to the whole world, will make everyone converge towards exactly the same point of view on the "good" way of life, which happens by chance to be the one which corresponds exactly to the lifestyle that you imagine to be ideal for your average Westerner, accustomed to its comfort, and not wanting to lose it?
As you don't print anything at all (goldfish? Or age? Or congenital?) It's: direct democracy and local community * to begin with, to prove that it works and that it is attractive.
* can go from the village to a country, through a region.
ABC2019 wrote:
The small problem is that if they are not autonomous in energy, fossil or thorium, ores, and in various industries, you will be a little obliged to take into account the existence of the outside world anyway.
eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:
The small problem is that if they are not autonomous in energy, fossil or thorium, ores, and in various industries, you will be a little obliged to take into account the existence of the outside world anyway.
It is only a problem for those who think in black and white, without nuance, to break the solutions they dislike?
Where is the problem with having to deal with reality BUT strive for an ideal? Not everything is done at the click of a mouse.
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 118 guests