Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 18816
- Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
- Location: 04
- x 5803
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
Hey, will you stop with your "pedo" shit??? I'm not insulting you...
0 x
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
knot head
friendly wood
Do you want a retrospective anthology of all your sweet language towards me? In addition to your regular defamations and generally your rudeness towards all those who do not say amen to you!
Oh, I almost forgot: yes, yes, doctor, you're right!

It's true that your archaic ideas about pedo thingamajig are bullshit, but it's your choice, which I respect by reminding you of it every time.Hey, will you stop with your "pedo" shit???
and what's more, you have voluntary Alzheimer's!I'm not insulting you...


Oh, I almost forgot: yes, yes, doctor, you're right!

1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
Health authorities have suspended chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 18816
- Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
- Location: 04
- x 5803
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 31209
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 6274
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
Oh, a skeptic like you with a guyrouette narrative... not good.
0 x
“Evil” carries within itself its own condemnation”
Ministry of Pravda under various suspicious second-noses: GuyGadeboisLeRetour, alias: Twistytwik, GuyGadebois, gfgh64, Plasmanu, etc.
Ministry of Pravda under various suspicious second-noses: GuyGadeboisLeRetour, alias: Twistytwik, GuyGadebois, gfgh64, Plasmanu, etc.
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
26/04/25, 11:58
ahmed
ahmed
A doctor whose name I have forgotten said: when you are young with a healthy immune system, vaccines are useless and if the person becomes old, then you should definitely not vaccinate them. This is confirmed by official statistics again.Health authorities have suspended the anti-chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. This is on 26/04/25, 11:58
Health authorities have suspended anti-chikungunya vaccination people over 65 (on Reunion Island and Mayotte) after noticing several unpleasant side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 14661
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1795
- Contact :
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
It must be said that this is the first live attenuated vaccine, and that increased vigilance is normal.Ahmed wrote:Health authorities have suspended chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.
There is no reason to stop vaccination for the non-fragile population, which will thus avoid serious consequences for its health.98,9% of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 (corresponding to the threshold value and considered a seroresponse) at 28 days after vaccination;
This percentage was maintained up to 6 months after vaccination (96,3%).
Antibody persistence was assessed 12 and 24 months after vaccination in study VLA1553-303 (followed by a subset of participants from study VLA1553-301). Results showed that 99,5% (n = 183/184) and 97,1% (n = 268/276) of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 at 1 year and 2 years after vaccination, respectively. https://www.vidal.fr/actualites/31048-i ... gunya.html
I remind Janic, who still can't make a quote, that Jenner's vaccine was also an attenuated virus. Later, they will make a more effective mRNA vaccine, with fewer side effects.
0 x
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
Izy, the integer part of the figure in your quote is missing: it is 98,9%, which is a good performance.
My previous message was purely informative and contained no judgment on my part, nor any ulterior motives, I would like to point out...
My previous message was purely informative and contained no judgment on my part, nor any ulterior motives, I would like to point out...
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
izmentor
https://www.infovac.ch/fr/faq/developpe ... %20maladie.
Live attenuated vaccines Vaccines living attenuated (MMR: Measles-Mumps-Rubella, chickenpox, shingles, yellow fever, rotavirus).
Vaccines containing the whole microbe, in the form inactivated. The microbe is killed; It is completely incapable of multiplying and therefore causing disease. Inactivated whole-cell vaccines are generally less effective than live attenuated vaccines; they often require multiple doses or boosters. Their main advantage is that they cause very few side effects and can be administered even to people with weakened immune systems.
For clarification, there are not only attenuated vaccines, but also vaccines... etc ...
Fewer side effects, no eye! The side effects supposedly reduced by mRNA have not been proven due to lack of historical perspective or initial cheating by not counting the effects immediately following the vaccine, since BP refuses to recognize side effects before a delay of several days, denying any causality by this vaccine. Moreover, side effects are reported at only 10% or much less (some say only 1%) given the difficulties in reporting these side effects (normally it is up to the doctor to make this type of declaration) and then few are retained especially in serious cases supposedly rare after this delay.
It is not without reason that even the French Senate, rather reluctant to denounce the vaccine myth, recognized that the H1N1 vaccination had been a real scam.
Now if people want to BELIEVE IT, that's their perfectly respectable choice. provided that not to "annoy" others like our big president did.

This is called wishful thinking because to be able to assert such a thing, one must provide indisputable evidence, which is completely lacking most of the time. Indeed, when adverse effects up to death occur, BP refuses to recognize the vaccine for cause under the fallacious pretext that causality is not proven even if there is a possible correlation. Which is stupid because the opposite is as valid as claiming that it is only a correlation and not causality because it is up to the manufacturer to prove that it is not their fault if these accidents occur. This is then settled before the independent courts.There is no reason to stop vaccination for the non-fragile population, which will thus avoid serious consequences for its health.
I would then remind Izmenteur that he does not know how to read what I am supposed to have quoted.I remind Janic, who still doesn't know how to quote, that Jenner's vaccine was also an attenuated virus.
https://www.infovac.ch/fr/faq/developpe ... %20maladie.
Live attenuated vaccines Vaccines living attenuated (MMR: Measles-Mumps-Rubella, chickenpox, shingles, yellow fever, rotavirus).
Vaccines containing the whole microbe, in the form inactivated. The microbe is killed; It is completely incapable of multiplying and therefore causing disease. Inactivated whole-cell vaccines are generally less effective than live attenuated vaccines; they often require multiple doses or boosters. Their main advantage is that they cause very few side effects and can be administered even to people with weakened immune systems.
For clarification, there are not only attenuated vaccines, but also vaccines... etc ...
and the bastard is sinking! Whoever says more efficient implies that the others were not or not sufficiently so. Give some figures!Later they will make a more effective mRNA vaccine, with fewer side effects.
Fewer side effects, no eye! The side effects supposedly reduced by mRNA have not been proven due to lack of historical perspective or initial cheating by not counting the effects immediately following the vaccine, since BP refuses to recognize side effects before a delay of several days, denying any causality by this vaccine. Moreover, side effects are reported at only 10% or much less (some say only 1%) given the difficulties in reporting these side effects (normally it is up to the doctor to make this type of declaration) and then few are retained especially in serious cases supposedly rare after this delay.
It is not without reason that even the French Senate, rather reluctant to denounce the vaccine myth, recognized that the H1N1 vaccination had been a real scam.
Now if people want to BELIEVE IT, that's their perfectly respectable choice. provided that not to "annoy" others like our big president did.
Woof! What a joke! They'll be up to 120% soon!98,9% of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 (corresponding to the threshold value and considered a seroresponse) at 28 days after vaccination;

0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 14661
- Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
- Location: picardie
- x 1795
- Contact :
Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?
I know, but there was someone who used it as a pretext for his usual anti-vax ranting.Ahmed wrote:no judgment on my part, nor any ulterior motive, I would like to point out...

The vaccine for 18-64 year olds is still in place, whether he likes it or not.
0 x
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 176 guests