Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Hey, will you stop with your "pedo" shit??? I'm not insulting you...

[Janic]

knot head friendly wood

Hey, will you stop with your "pedo" shit???

It's true that your archaic ideas about pedo thingamajig are bullshit, but it's your choice, which I respect by reminding you of it every time.

I'm not insulting you...

and what's more, you have voluntary Alzheimer's! Do you want a retrospective anthology of all your sweet language towards me? In addition to your regular defamations and generally your rudeness towards all those who do not say amen to you!
Oh, I almost forgot: yes, yes, doctor, you're right!

[Ahmed]

Health authorities have suspended chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

The money is Ixchiq
(A hit!)

[Obamot]

Oh, a skeptic like you with a guyrouette narrative... not good.

[Janic]

26/04/25, 11:58

ahmed

Health authorities have suspended the anti-chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. This is on 26/04/25, 11:58

Health authorities have suspended anti-chikungunya vaccination people over 65 (on Reunion Island and Mayotte) after noticing several unpleasant side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.

A doctor whose name I have forgotten said: when you are young with a healthy immune system, vaccines are useless and if the person becomes old, then you should definitely not vaccinate them. This is confirmed by official statistics again.

[izentrop]

Health authorities have suspended chikungunya vaccination for people over 65 (on Réunion Island and Mayotte) after noting several serious side effects. The Ixchiq vaccine is the culprit.

It must be said that this is the first live attenuated vaccine, and that increased vigilance is normal.

98,9% of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 (corresponding to the threshold value and considered a seroresponse) at 28 days after vaccination;
This percentage was maintained up to 6 months after vaccination (96,3%).
Antibody persistence was assessed 12 and 24 months after vaccination in study VLA1553-303 (followed by a subset of participants from study VLA1553-301). Results showed that 99,5% (n = 183/184) and 97,1% (n = 268/276) of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 at 1 year and 2 years after vaccination, respectively. https://www.vidal.fr/actualites/31048-i ... gunya.html

There is no reason to stop vaccination for the non-fragile population, which will thus avoid serious consequences for its health.

I remind Janic, who still can't make a quote, that Jenner's vaccine was also an attenuated virus. Later, they will make a more effective mRNA vaccine, with fewer side effects.

[Ahmed]

Izy, the integer part of the figure in your quote is missing: it is 98,9%, which is a good performance.

My previous message was purely informative and contained no judgment on my part, nor any ulterior motives, I would like to point out...

[Janic]

izmentor

There is no reason to stop vaccination for the non-fragile population, which will thus avoid serious consequences for its health.

This is called wishful thinking because to be able to assert such a thing, one must provide indisputable evidence, which is completely lacking most of the time. Indeed, when adverse effects up to death occur, BP refuses to recognize the vaccine for cause under the fallacious pretext that causality is not proven even if there is a possible correlation. Which is stupid because the opposite is as valid as claiming that it is only a correlation and not causality because it is up to the manufacturer to prove that it is not their fault if these accidents occur. This is then settled before the independent courts.

I remind Janic, who still doesn't know how to quote, that Jenner's vaccine was also an attenuated virus.

I would then remind Izmenteur that he does not know how to read what I am supposed to have quoted.
https://www.infovac.ch/fr/faq/developpe ... %20maladie.

Live attenuated vaccines Vaccines living attenuated (MMR: Measles-Mumps-Rubella, chickenpox, shingles, yellow fever, rotavirus).

Vaccines containing the whole microbe, in the form inactivated. The microbe is killed; It is completely incapable of multiplying and therefore causing disease. Inactivated whole-cell vaccines are generally less effective than live attenuated vaccines; they often require multiple doses or boosters. Their main advantage is that they cause very few side effects and can be administered even to people with weakened immune systems.

For clarification, there are not only attenuated vaccines, but also vaccines... etc ...

Later they will make a more effective mRNA vaccine, with fewer side effects.

and the bastard is sinking! Whoever says more efficient implies that the others were not or not sufficiently so. Give some figures!
Fewer side effects, no eye! The side effects supposedly reduced by mRNA have not been proven due to lack of historical perspective or initial cheating by not counting the effects immediately following the vaccine, since BP refuses to recognize side effects before a delay of several days, denying any causality by this vaccine. Moreover, side effects are reported at only 10% or much less (some say only 1%) given the difficulties in reporting these side effects (normally it is up to the doctor to make this type of declaration) and then few are retained especially in serious cases supposedly rare after this delay.
It is not without reason that even the French Senate, rather reluctant to denounce the vaccine myth, recognized that the H1N1 vaccination had been a real scam.
Now if people want to BELIEVE IT, that's their perfectly respectable choice. provided that not to "annoy" others like our big president did.

98,9% of participants had anti-CHIKV μPRNT50 neutralizing antibody titers ≥ 150 (corresponding to the threshold value and considered a seroresponse) at 28 days after vaccination;

Woof! What a joke! They'll be up to 120% soon!

[izentrop]

no judgment on my part, nor any ulterior motive, I would like to point out...

I know, but there was someone who used it as a pretext for his usual anti-vax ranting.
The vaccine for 18-64 year olds is still in place, whether he likes it or not.