Express your talent and ideas on the site!

[Christophe]

there was ekopedia, but it closed for lack of means

Ah? You who swear by the Wiki!
You see that this is not the perfect solution ... it does not exist anyway!
I made exactly that remark a few days ago: a wiki requires a lot of active people to be well managed!

that raises the question of the financing of a site by which readers ... it is nice to give the site can disappear anyway

And yes when I tell you that it is the big galley to maintain a site (= this forum) Afloat right now it's not for nothing! But I have the impression that it does not move many people ...

A site without funding will disappear faster in all cases, whether this funding be advertising or participatory ... it is the law of "dough"!

I know where the Internet is going now and I do not like it ... but, after all, it's the will of Internet users, we will have the web we chose to have ...

[Did67]

my preference for text and photos or short video, is only my opinion, not a criticism of a fully video solution

I understood it correctly.

It's just that it was curious, a kind of hiatus ...

[Christophe]

Why OR? 2 are completely complementary ...

Some Internet users prefer to watch videos, others to read ... and as video search engines are now more and more distinct from textual search engines, these 2 means of communication have to be used ...

[chatelot16]

there was ekopedia, but it closed for lack of means

Ah? You who swear by the Wiki!
You see that this is not the perfect solution ... it does not exist anyway!
I made exactly that remark a few days ago: a wiki requires a lot of active people to be well managed !.

when I quote the advantage of mediawiki as a way of classifying information I do not say that it is a perfect system ... I even say that it is a system that is not finished because it has too much gap security that makes it unusable when there are not enough people to defend it! on this point we agree, a small media wiki in public is quickly spammed

but we must see the advantages of what exists to do better!

for my project it will take good computer scientist to do better than the current mediawiki ... but by waiting it is possible to use mediawiki limited access to a limited number of participants to make a collaborative document writing

Finally I do not know how writing is done in wordpress when several people have permission to write ... is it exactly who wrote what? can one easily cancel a writing? with mediawiki we have these posibilities

[Christophe]

. do we see exactly who wrote what? can one easily cancel a writing? with mediawiki we have these posibilities

Of course, of course I would say ... as long as you have the rights ...

It is obviously less open than a Wiki that is based on a pooling of content by all readers, even if not registered (but less and less valid on wikipedia at least). On Wordpress you need an account with the necessary rights for writing ...

[Christophe]

Here is the 1er on the new version of the site written by Rémi Guillet: https://www.econologie.com/vie-changer-e ... i-guillet/

It passes in very first position on "life to change era"

Did67 just contacted me for an article, we hold you to the juice!

[Christophe]

Here is Ahmed writing his (the) 1ere article (from a member of forums) on the site: https://www.econologie.com/limites-physi ... rtinentes/

Congratulations to him! A corresponding topic on forums will be created shortly.

Did67 has one in preparation. It will certainly be published in the week.