Bistro for off-topic conversations

The developments of forums and the site. Humor and conviviality between the members of the forum - Tout est anything - Presentation of new registered members Relaxation, free time, leisure, sports, vacations, passions ... What do you do with your free time? Forum exchanges on our passions, activities, leisure ... creative or recreational! Publish your ads. Classifieds, cyber-actions and petitions, interesting sites, calendar, events, fairs, exhibitions, local initiatives, association activities .... No purely commercial advertising please.
User avatar
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 7859
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 630
Contact :

Bistro for off-topic conversations




by izentrop » 16/03/21, 12:30

Anyone who has grievances with others forumers, who have nothing to do with the current topics should do them here, eh!
Follow my eyes : Frown:
0 x
"Details make perfection and perfection is not a detail" Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4079
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 954

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 16/03/21, 12:32

Good initiative that you can also apply to Raoult, your obsession. Now you can come and vomit your hatred here.
1 x
"It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on smart things. The most serious disease of the brain is to think." (J. Rouxel)
"No ?" ©
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect" .... "There is absolutely nothing to do about the climate" .... "Nature is shit". (Exnihiloest, aka Blédina)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 16644
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1324

Re: Bistro for continual FLOOD




by Obamot » 12/04/21, 10:57

izentrop wrote:Anyone who has grievances with others forumers, who have nothing to do with the current topics should do them here, eh!
Follow my eyes : Frown:

We will do better than that Izentrop, this thread can also respond to your flood, you see, it is double-edged such a thread Image

I'm responding to ABC2019 here, for its repeated attempt to rot Janic's posts.

Obamot wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:
Obamot wrote:

But where can you get these numbers from ? Image Image

out of nowhere, these are not real figures, it was just to show that it could very well be that vaccination was in the minority in the reduction of mortality, and yet it was essential for eradication disease, on a theoretical example.

Sorry to use reasoning that is beyond your intellectual capacities, I get tricked every time ...
And me, you will excuse me for asking questions that go beyond yours on the whole. The application of your theoretical slingshot is already shattered with that https://www.bluewin.ch/fr/infos/faits-d ... 63981.html [not answered] And if we examine in detail, how can you put forward such a figure “even at minority incidence”, While it is proven that ALL the“ forecasts ”were bogus, so you have no basis - while Pfizer announced an efficiency of 95% - which is even very insufficient since it does not do much better than the immunity of the population “in general” (a result that would be achieved without any vaccine at all). Worse still, the vaccine would be a serious brake on a return to normalcy:

- "We make you make antibodies by vaccines which instead of neutralizing your virus, will help it to enter the cells, sometimes even to replicate itself ..."
https://planetes360.fr/alexandra-henrio ... repliquer/


And while it would take a result> 99%, our great scientist argues with 10% as if it were possibly significant data in his demonstration ... NOT AT ALL: even partial, your figure is useless!

Sorry if my intellectual capacities exceeded, allow me to pierce yours with such a large magnification : Mrgreen:


ABC2019 wrote: : Shock: the vaccine is not intended to do better than natural immunity,
Pretends not to understand, fails to answer the essential points ... that's it ... continue your rotting in order, but IT'S DEAD ... For a year your words have been blown => health-pollution-prevention / covid-19-list-of-effective-vaccines-t16510-2010.html # p441613 )

The rest was ad personam argument and other non sequitur talk. This geneticist has certainly studied the question more than you and Janic's answer is very relevant, Health-pollution-prevention / vaccination-and-health-for-or-against-t11411-1000.html # p441704 you're still in the villainous bias of FAKE NEWS samples!

You will have a hard time continuing, we will respond to your flood here (if we respond)

Here is all the post of Janic Image


Janic wrote:abc pedro
the vaccine is not intended to do better than natural immunity, it is intended to immunize without causing death. (and my "fromde", I guess my formula, is not intended to be applied numerically to a real case, it was just an example to show that it could be possible, but ok I shouldn't have used this mode of reasoning that is inaccessible to you)
.
Precisely, your stupid reasoning is inaccessible to normal people; So your gibberish at the playground; is only meant to satisfy your narcissistic ego.
You are so bad that you take for granted an American graph not sourced, but not the European statistics not sourced either, (for the moment) but which correspond perfectly, in not truncated to the grah of infovac, "official" site of fakenews, truncated it! You got a hell of a lot of c… nneries!
if this were true, then we should observe an increase in cases among vaccinated compared to the rest of the population, is that your prediction?

Still wanting to stick your fantasies to others. If 95%, and even more, have a sufficient immune system, the vaccines don't make you sicker than a bug bite, a little inflammation and it goes. On the other hand the most fragile, them, do not pass through and break their pipe
This Madame Henrion-Caude seems to me to have all the signs of a paranoid psychosis with delirious flashes, but hey she has her audience of fans, those who suffer from the same illness.
It is sure that you are much more qualified than she, everyone noticed it mister the super specialist in everything… what you do not know!
But frankly if all these people do not want to be vaccinated, I have absolutely nothing against. It gives us a little chance to stop having to read his bullshit.
You mean you stop your bullshit? Phew, finally! : roll:
0 x
Club of the “funny ones” of forum: ABC2019, Izentrop, Pedrodelavega, Sicetaitsimple (nothing changes, ah if Macro on the jump seat)
User avatar
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 59455
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 2401

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by Christophe » 12/04/21, 11:43

Where's my beer? : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 16644
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1324

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by Obamot » 12/04/21, 20:07

ABC2019 wrote:
Janic wrote:Now a little look at the scarecrow that represents in the collective unconscious, the fear of tetanus

Dance WHO World Health Statistics Yearbook, we can compare England and France from 1963 to 1972
In 1963 the A had 25.903 vaccinated and 13 died of tetanus, while France had 519.494 vaccinated and 293 dead.
In 1965 the A 351.328 vaccinated and 21 dead; France 682.000 vaccinated and 258 dead
In 1967 the A 849.339 vaccinated or 2.5 times more and ...18 dead for a population of about 55 million h;
France 965.738 vaccinated and 234 dead for 49 million H.

We realize, for the A that with 2.5 times more vaccinated there are only 3 deaths of difference, and therefore that the vaccine has nothing to do with it.


Since other factors come into play, you can't infer anything at all. But until you get that point it will be a conversation at cross purposes.



Where are my popcorns? : Cheesy:
0 x
Club of the “funny ones” of forum: ABC2019, Izentrop, Pedrodelavega, Sicetaitsimple (nothing changes, ah if Macro on the jump seat)

User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 16644
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1324

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by Obamot » 12/04/21, 23:25

Obamot wrote:
pedrodelavega wrote:
Janic wrote: like that reminds Casasnovas, harassed by the extractor and justice found him wrong,

Did justice give him wrong?

In any case in his last video .... : Shock: :
The "top" at 17m30.

Don't you feel completely alone? ? Image Image Image these videos are worth nothing, you're wasting your time frankly.
Haven't you finished rotting the PB2487 / 88 / PDV wires?
Here I have a present for you. Not far from the stupid videos that you currently post ... You will like it I'm sure!

https://odysee.com/@Lav%C3%A9rit%C3%A9p ... -Taygeta:b
0 x
Club of the “funny ones” of forum: ABC2019, Izentrop, Pedrodelavega, Sicetaitsimple (nothing changes, ah if Macro on the jump seat)
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 7986
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 355

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by ABC2019 » 13/04/21, 04:01

Obamot wrote:
Obamot wrote:
pedrodelavega wrote:Did justice give him wrong?

In any case in his last video .... : Shock: :
The "top" at 17m30.

Don't you feel completely alone? ? Image Image Image these videos are worth nothing, you're wasting your time frankly.
Haven't you finished rotting the PB2487 / 88 / PDV wires?
Here I have a present for you. Not far from the stupid videos that you currently post ... You will like it I'm sure!

https://odysee.com/@Lav%C3%A9rit%C3%A9p ... -Taygeta:b

I loved it .. it's been a long time since the Unknowns had not released a new sketch, they are still so good : Lol:
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 16644
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1324

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by Obamot » 13/04/21, 12:10

It's good there, you're in the HS, you should only post here : Cheesy: Yet it is your level, to give any credit to a guy like this escogriffe from Casanovas, it's not really rewarding - I say that because it is on this nonos that you sharpen your canines - shows that you suppose someone here would be interested!

It's nerd how far your egocentrism takes you, isn't it? : Cheesy:

Macro wrote:the study presented is on children under 5 years old .... So either children vaccinated to go to creche for 2 to 3 years or unvaccinated children who will have remained in a "restricted" environment during the same period. So not at all the same environments ...

In any case .... We just went to 57% for vaccination ...

Weren't you the one who said we could make numbers say whatever we wanted? :P
It's stupid because I had polio (but cured and cured in time ...) and I was “vaccinated”.

Well, I'm going to eat my Kellogg's stuffed with sugar with milk, back to “normal” :P
0 x
Club of the “funny ones” of forum: ABC2019, Izentrop, Pedrodelavega, Sicetaitsimple (nothing changes, ah if Macro on the jump seat)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 16644
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 1324

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by Obamot » 15/04/21, 14:06

ABC2019 wrote:hydroxy blah-blah-blah https://www.nature.com/articles/bla-bla-bla
Here is another study with obvious biases.
You may deny it, you cannot have serious studies that say everything and their opposite ...
I don't know if you've seen (it's starting to accumulate eh ...) the authors' interests?
We do not hear you denounce this kind of “official corruption” of the labs, For Pr Calmy it is millions of Swiss francs ...
You still haven't explained (or understood) the metabolic benefits of HCQ, which in themselves demonstrate the obvious beneficial effect of this molecule.
I do not understand that with all the studies that show overwhelming positive results, you still come with this type of cloth to drive the point home ad nauseam.
Last but not least, you have a late war, ivermectin is even “better”

You take it down a notch.
1 x
Club of the “funny ones” of forum: ABC2019, Izentrop, Pedrodelavega, Sicetaitsimple (nothing changes, ah if Macro on the jump seat)
User avatar
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 7859
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 630
Contact :

Re: Bistro for off-topic conversations




by izentrop » 19/04/21, 09:11

ABC2019 wrote:
izentrop wrote:You contribute a lot too ... permanent HS and maybe also in quantum mechanics, the solution is not always the most logical. : Twisted:

there is no HS in the video, that was not the point that made me think about it ... just the spectacle of a collection of people denying the obvious and chasing the one who is the only one in theirs recall, with all the possible bogus arguments, the false moralizing judgments, the attempts at exclusion ... the usual human stupidity what : Mrgreen:
I was thinking of respecting the theme of the subject. The subject was not virology, unless it was some kind of "humor" :?:

That obamot and janic do not respect him, it is their habit.

Instead of answering them HS, a copy / paste in the appropriate subject. : Mrgreen:
I was also thinking of your scratchy side stuck on certain points, but hey!
0 x
"Details make perfection and perfection is not a detail" Leonardo da Vinci


 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "The bistro: site life, leisure and relaxation, humor and conviviality and Classifieds"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 27 guests