ABC2019 wrote:eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:it's actually rather nice compared to what it can usually come out ... like what the criteria adapt
The criteria are exactly proportional to your stupidity or your propaganda, or both (that remains to be decided), which you demonstrate.
My tolerance for repetitive bullshit from a given individual wanes over time, so the threshold for triggering insults may drop.
personally, I support your insults, I agree to discuss with you from time to time (except when it's too boring), that's not the problem.
My question is correct in relation to Christophe, what he supports or not on his forum. I'm just asking for fairness in judgments, and not to be punished for behavior when others do 10 times worse on the side without being told anything, that's all.
If you claim to insult and get angry when you find people too stupid, you have to accept the same thing in the face, and you have no reason to ask for the exclusion of those who are only wrong to not share your opinions.
Another proof in images that you are completely next to the plate to claim millions of deaths to consider the RCA as worrying.
and proof that you are completely unconscious, even criminal in calling for the continuation of fossil fuels to the end.
On these curves, we see the temperature in red which rises well after the CO2 emissions in brown.
it proves above all that you do not understand the difference between a function and its integral, that is to say between the annual emissions and the cumulative emissions. This is serious for an electronics engineer because it is the same difference as between an intensity and an electric charge (for example the charge of a capacitor).
Making such a big mistake and then insulting others by telling them that they don't understand anything, and calling them all names, it's a bit laughable anyway ...
1) I am not confusing anything at all.
The brown curve represents the annual CO2 emissions, so what?
The brown curve is interesting to show that we are not at the maximum annual emissions, another 40 years or so of growth if nothing is done. (As you claim)
Take the purple curve which represents the accumulation, you can see that the temperature continues to increase, once the CO2 has stabilized (CO2 emissions at almost zero)
and we can clearly see that the red curve (temperature) will grow more and more significantly over time and over CO2 emissions, but so will you! (climatic inertia)
to only be interested in today's temperature is to show total bad faith for someone who claims to be a physicist.
I maintain: to claim millions of deaths today for making the RCA disturbing is utter nonsense.
2) the behavior is not that you are insulting, you are not.
The problem is that under the air of a scientist you endlessly support absurdities, I call that being a real idiot (and therefore harmful to the forum), as opposed to an ignorant one, who has excuses for him.
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max