Surprise for éconologues friends!

[chatelot16]

another problem when we land on the wordpress: when we found the button has 3 bar and we click on forum it does not go directly to the home of the forum , it shows a list of what one wonders on which click

the same for the shop

it's a step too far away from new visitors

when we click on shop we must arrive directly aq the home of the shop or the different part are better visible than in the wordpress menu ... this subdivision in wordpress is a useless complication

and in addition with this complication of the will have to manage these subdivision in double with risk of incoherence between the 2

Another weirdness when we open this menu 3 bar we do not know how to close it ... it does not close by clicking elsewhere on the page ... there is no cross to close windows style ... on looks like android! you have to click 2eme once on the 3barre to close

this android is really a pollution of the computer by its lack of ergonomics and logic ... and everyone imitates to make modern

[Christophe]

this android is really a pollution of the computer by its lack of ergonomics and logic ... and everyone imitates to make modern

I did'nt understand everything; Are you talking about the "Android" version of the site?

We can not please everyone: in the 3 parts of the site (main site, forum and shop) there are links of menus CLAIR and VISIBLES which return towards the other parts of the site ...

[chatelot16]

in the wordpress, there is no visible button to the other part of the site!

the button has 3barre is the only way to make a menu appear ... the one who does not know it will find neither the forum nor the shop

that's what I call android style ... a unclear style that pollutes computing

[Christophe]

Uh, what is this menu?

Unless you visit the site with archaic resolutions or on a mobile phone?

In this case you see the "Android" version ... at my place in 1920x1080 (standard resolution of modern PCs of 15 or 17 inches for a few years already, at least 6 years or 7 years I would say when the FULL HS was democratized ) the Android version appears at level 6 (!) of Display Zoom on Firefox in this case you can see this version:

So I did some tests: you have to go down to 1024 x 768 ("standard" resolution from the beginning of the 2000s ... still ... it's been 15 years!) To have the "Android" version in browser zoom by default ... in 1280 x 720 in browser zoom by default, we are (already) on the normal version ...

Solution for you: increase your resolution or play on the reverse zoom ... "CTRL + -"

A site does not adapt to resolutions that are no longer used by the majority of Internet users ... it's up to the user to think about getting updated ... you could accuse me of favoring obsolescence but there you must not push eh!

[Christophe]

In 2016, the 1024 x 768 accounted for 5,6% of the users according to this site: http://fr.screenresolution.org/

These figures include the mobile users' resolutions too ... and 1024 x 768 is also the resolution of a lot of tablets also that's why it seems high ... in desktop, it must be between 1 and 2% .. .

[Christophe]

Crazy end-of-table resolutions !!

2734 6400x1800 0.001%

2735 6467x5174 0.001%

2736 6827x5120 0.001%

2737 6830x3840 0.001%

2738 6902x3880 0.001%

2739 7296x4104 0.001%

2740 7680x4320 16:9 UHDTV 0.001%

2741 8400x5250 0.001%

2742 8533x6400 0.001%

2743 9600x1800 0.001%

2744 10240x6000 0.001%

2745 13653x8533 0.001%

2746 13964x8378 0.001%

2747 14400x9000 0.001%

2748 16800x10500 0.001%

2749 19648x11051 0.001%

2750 21120x3240 0.001%

2751 60300x10800 0.001%

60300x10800 !!! Is that the screen of the NASA or ESA control center or what ?? Or just "bugs" ???

[Christophe]

BMOL compared to everything I just said: up to 2013, the 1024 x 768 accounted for more than 10% http://fr.screenresolution.org/year-2013/ and in 2009 it was the first resolution with over 40% http://fr.screenresolution.org/year-2009/

But we are no longer in 2013 and even less in 2009 ...

[chatelot16]

bin yes I use a notebook with a resolution that you find too weak

is this econology that will force me to use a bigger computer?

why change the presentation according to the resolution while the button that you watch would be quite legible in my resolution of 1024x600

I suspected there was a difference between what you saw and what I saw ... and I had to insist heavily to have an answer

which defines the threshold which changes the presentation ... defined by wordpress or configurable ... I hope that there is a parameter to change to have your complete button on the small computer and the tablet!

it is only on the small smartphone that it is necessary to compact as much as possible

it is not only the small pc and the tablet there is also the raspberry pi which are a solution of the future to make access to the economic internet ... in general with television low-end serving of monitor thus definition enough limited too

econology should be the first site to promote economic solutions

[Christophe]

It's not ME that finds it too weak ... It's a resolution that is no longer suitable for surfing the Internet in 2016! Nothing else to add ...

Go visit the heavyweights of the net with such a resolution, even Google is no longer suitable, the proof:

Ce forum is more suited than Google to 1024 and you will accuse me (as I presented ...) to promote obsolescence?
Fault stop messing!

[chatelot16]

exactly!

and it does not penalize those who have low-resolution computers, it also penalizes those who have bad eyesight and find it more comfortable to adjust their computer with a low resolution to have a bigger character ... and in this case I think it's even more serious!

the question is where does this threshold of presentation change come from, is it modifiable?

it does not matter if I have bigger computers ... my goal is to facilitate internet access for everyone and to make it easier to use old machines: that's why I often use it also ... and it's pretty rare that I have to turn on a big computer for a recalcitarnt site

it should not be econology that shows the wrong example