New themes on forums econology?

[hic]

I wonder what can think of Ginette tata who will shop at the supermarket with a tight retirement budget ?! What you say is good in theory (at the same time, to be Manichean in health is perhaps the universal solution [CIS, ie your words] but with this kind of practice / speech would everyone be in good health? Should we severely repress those who continue to play yoyo?) In practice it may be another amha sleeve pair.

Hic: I do not take a position (I do it already enough in the threads ) I'm just saying that you have to be careful with certain words .... One opinion among many on a topic title story after all! That leaves the debate open ...

Doctors are dedicated managers of the
Ministry of Health, what a nice title! If the ministry of the economy was becoming a ministry of abundance, it would make laugh (yellow!) A lot of people ...

those who play yoyo are already punished,
should be condemned to death and in the short term!
do you see the problem now?

health is easy to understand,

but you also have the sport, the exchange of plants and everything
In short, we must do pedagogy

[Christophe]

Hula I see that it inspired the world. Will read all that!

It is true my proposition can be confusing. I have another one:
What will you say about sustainable recipes as opposed to "single-use recipes"?

Here is the compromise I found: Sustainable consumption, food and ecological recipes it's not a new sub forum but that of "sustainable and responsible consumption" which has been renamed. Otherwise it would have made too much duplication ...

[Christophe]

Hula I see that it inspired the world. Will read all that!

Well I read diagonally your proposals.

So a sub forum "Health, pollution and risk prevention" what would you say?

As for sustainable consumption, we could base ourselves on this under forum https://www.econologie.com/forums/pollution- ... -vf35.html not very active by renaming it ...

[Avibel]

So a sub forum "Health, pollution and risk prevention" what would you say?

Good job synthesis Christophe, for once we have not highlighted our disagreements between Gallic tribes, I congratulate!
A little precision: the sub forum "Sustainable consumption, food and ecological recipes"will be contained in"Health, pollution and risk prevention"or is it the opposite?

[Christophe]

No, we have no "sub sub forum"(but it would be possible in fact), the 2 will therefore be" at the same height "... accessible from the index ...

For example the impact of wood heating particles on health is health / pollution but not really consumption / food ...

[Obamot]

So a sub forum "Health, pollution and risk prevention" what would you say?

Good job Christophe

+1

By the way, do not we say "poisoning"... for the "Health" rather than "pollution"? If yes, eventually:

(Health;) Prevention of risks, causes and effects

(Pollution:) Sustainable consumption and ecological recipes

[Christophe]

(Health;) Prevention of risks, causes and effects

(Pollution:) Sustainable consumption and ecological recipes

I did'nt understand everything...
Le forum consumption is already "done": https://www.econologie.com/forums/consommati ... -vf51.html

For pollution from agriculture (therefore indirectly from food) there is this other forum: https://www.econologie.com/forums/agricultur ... -vf37.html

To summarize:
a) The 1er = food from a consumer point of view and therefore consumer
b) The 2ieme = feeding from a production point of view so producer

I'm good or not?

[Obamot]

I'm good or not?

Bah! It remains an area of ​​"research", that's why I like the intellectual debate that revolves around!

How do I see the schema of the trick:

Pollution...
> causes more or less serious poisoning
>> which involves the demonstration of symptoms
>>> which leads to an awareness
>>>> which triggers an appropriate action

Pollution is in principle exogenous to everything that concerns our "physiological health" ... (if we exclude the production of "products" resulting from stress, even within the human body). So since the ad hoc section already exists: yes "You have good"!

So would this remain eternally?

(Health;) Prevention of risks, causes and effects

[Christophe]

Yes I had proposed just above:

"Health, pollution and risk prevention"

Which is very close to:

"Health, prevention of risks, causes and effects"

[Obamot]

Ok, my two cents of € uros ...

It's not me, it's just hierarchically speaking, one must eventually see the "pollution" as one of the causes causing disorders of the "Health" among many others, such as:

- diseases;
- accidents;
- non-criminal fires;
- human malice (assaults, criminal acts, etc.)
- climate problems;
- addictions;
- inappropriate laws (risk factors);
- iatrogenesis;
etc. And not only THE cause (what the title could suggest, and / or at least induce a reduction of the field of discussion?)

Thereby, "Pollution" is already included in one or two places in the title.
Under:
— "causes";
and / or
— "risks";

Why, therefore, put it particularly prominently in this section?
What would make it predominate over any of the "causes" from the list above?
Finally the question of the relationship between "cause and effects" had already been discussed in many sons, with a certain consensus on his interest.