Listing of trolls from forum and monitoring of sanctions

[eclectron]

this thread is not to resume a nth discussion on the subjects which opposed us, it is to see if each one has its typology of trolls.

This is a fine example of deafness.
I am only illustrating with a concrete example, a general remark concerning your attitude on forum. Attitude that can be described as Trollesque. And you sweep it away with the back of your hand ....

Personally, I only have a problem with 3 people, those of the JAbEx method.

Exnihiloest is not what one might call a Troll, it is at the human level that it does not work: no empathy and considers himself sufficient. Everything I hate in humans: a mechanical being without a soul.
I'm not saying you shouldn't be mechanical, I am, I'm saying it's not enough.
(Lessdewatt is in the same vein but intervenes little, just enough to also be humanly harmful.)

ABC, from my point of view has a goodwill that is personal to it to defend *, with this objective, everything is good, even what is false
For sure that he uses logic but very often pernicious, simply to consolidate his goodwill and therefore he remains outside any global and detached vision that would make his speech intelligent

Janic, same as ABC, personal goodwill to defend *, uses a detail in the speech of the other to erase the generality of the speech, however valid. In short, no progress possible. Quite childish method, a bit the same operating mode as ABC.

* means closed to other possibilities than their current knowledge.

In short, I only see 3 old idiots there! , JOE method, obliges. We don't remake ourselves.
From there to conclude that with age, the opening disappears, one to humanity, the other two to personal evolution?

[Janic]

Janic, same as ABC, personal goodwill to defend *, uses a detail in the speech of the other to erase the generality of the speech, however valid. In short, no progress possible. Quite childish method, a bit the same operating mode as ABC.
* means closed to other possibilities than their current knowledge.
In short, I only see 3 old idiots there! , JOE method, obliges. We don't remake ourselves.
From there to conclude that with age, the opening disappears, one to humanity, the other two to personal evolution

So typical example that you are an old troll jerk, then!

Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia
In Internet slang, a troll characterizes an individual or a behavior that aims to generate controversy.

Yes that's right !
if not on a personal level concerning the old con: I AM NOT OLD! For the rest, listen to Brassens!

[A.D. 44]

I confirm that we have highlighted this super troll method, for proof last week the exchanges had resumed serenely

For someone newly registered ... you have a very relevant vision of the forum and his past !!!

but I volunteer for 15 days of vacation

He's so funny !

[ABC2019]

Do you think Janic and I have the same way of working?
it is absolutely not my impression for me, regardless of who is right or wrong.
On the other hand actually I have no problem with the posts of lessdewatt.

The only common point between Janic and me seems to be that we have a point of disagreement with you, it is obviously the only criterion that you use to judge people ...

[ABC2019]

Janic, same as ABC, personal goodwill to defend *, uses a detail in the speech of the other to erase the generality of the speech, however valid. In short, no progress possible. Quite childish method, a bit the same operating mode as ABC.
* means closed to other possibilities than their current knowledge.
In short, I only see 3 old idiots there! , JOE method, obliges. We don't remake ourselves.
From there to conclude that with age, the opening disappears, one to humanity, the other two to personal evolution

So typical example that you are an old troll jerk, then!

Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia
In Internet slang, a troll characterizes an individual or a behavior that aims to generate controversy.

Yes that's right !
if not on a personal level concerning the old con: I AM NOT OLD! For the rest, listen to Brassens!

I note anyway that this type of exchange only exists when a JOER is involved, either it concerns a JOER with a non-JOER, or two JOERs. I don't really remember reading that kind of prose without a JOER in the loop.

[eclectron]

So typical example that you are an old troll jerk, then!

Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia
In Internet slang, a troll characterizes an individual or a behavior that aims to generate controversy.

Yes that's right !
if not on a personal level concerning the old con: I AM NOT OLD! For the rest, listen to Brassens!

Sorry, I also forgot your "it's the one who says it that's there" method

For the age, everything is relative, I would be curious to know your age, that I can do my mea culpa.

Paul and Mike, if you want ... how do you talk to each other so that the situation changes?

[ABC2019]

I confirm that we have highlighted this super troll method, for proof last week the exchanges had resumed serenely

For someone newly registered ... you have a very relevant vision of the forum and his past !!!

well no he registered on 12/12/12 (!!), he only posted one message per year or less ... and then suddenly he posted in a burst as if he knew everything about the forum !

but the Sherlock Holmes who managed to guess that I was sending messages to myself under the name of pedro in September to respond in case we had the idea that we were the same person in December (and then several of continuation eh, because one that would not have been enough !!!), will surely look into the question, they are smart!

[eclectron]

The only common point between Janic and me seems to be that we have a point of disagreement with you, it is obviously the only criterion that you use to judge people ...

The disagreements are not on the same points but the method has a certain similarity: that of opposing rather stupid logic, without hindsight (without questioning what the other is saying and especially not trying to do it), in order to defend his personal position, no doubt dearly acquired. In short, a lot to lose, in short only ego ...

[ABC2019]

The disagreements are not on the same points but the method has a certain similarity: that of opposing rather stupid logic,

seriously, do you think janic works by logic?

[eclectron]

The disagreements are not on the same points but the method has a certain similarity: that of opposing rather stupid logic,

seriously, do you think janic works by logic?

I am not a reference, I find it all logical, since I manage to adopt the point of view of the other.
Even in delusional flushes (pathology) there is logic. I am speaking of lived experience in front of concerned people.
From my point of view there is the same kind of "childish" logic for both, all to be right at the end.
The truth does not matter, what matters is to be right.
We all have that, more or less marked.