Grelinette wrote:Hello everybody
This is a vast question that is often debated and some people claim that aggression is part of our genetic heritage.
History to open the debate on this potentially conflictual issue, I put it here because I see that many of the open debates on the site econology, and dealing with interesting topics, end up in a confrontation and a particular aggressiveness ... and I do not I do not remember so many conflicting debates about forum few years ago. (my inscription dates from 2008 ... already!
)
The most curious, having read several pages of fascinating comments on equally exciting subjects, is to note that some virulent oppositions come from commentators who seemed to me to defend the same opinions! ...
Where does this reflex come from wanting to cross iron? Is it an anthropogenic specificity?
Aggression is simply explained by survival. Which can be partly genetic, epigenetic and cultural (learned), or whatever.
Theoretically, if we had a well-made head, survival should only concern the integrity of the physical body and period, but as we identify with our thoughts, the same survival reaction occurs when we "exchange", or rather when we oppose ideas.
An idea contrary to my ideas challenges the mental construct I have developed throughout my life.
Mental construction that I hold, which made me safe until then, that I mastered more or less.
The other comes to attack MY mental construction, and therefore ME, since I identify with my mental construction.
Instability, creates insecurity, fear, and comes aggression as a defense reaction, just to preserve one's ideas.
It is quite unhealthy behavior but we are + 7Mds to do it, so it's normal.
The awareness of its interior
in the moment* helps cure this disease.
* Easier to do after the fact than in the moment, which does not have the same efficiency.
We are so made, to varying degrees, aggressive depending on the moment, what we eat or drunk etc.
Let's personalize the debate:
It all depends on how the person expresses himself.
Personally (culturally so ...) I hate any intrusive speech, faculty that comes to tell me how I should think, or tell me that I think badly.
Which is very different in form, of a discourse that presents another opinion in an open way, leaving me the choice to adhere to it or not.
I understand that I sometimes practice what I'm sorry for ...
Let's personalize a little more:
When
Ahmed et
Sen-no-sen come with their speech and vocabulary of F Rodier (which closes the exchange to the uninitiated but let's go ...), tell me that everything is done and that whatever we do everything is fucked, I feel assaulted, denied in my nobody.
I do not know if that's really what you think but that's how I perceive your speech.
This comes to attack my mental construction, because it contradicts the hope that I have in me that we can go to a better world.
It's up to us humans to make this planet a paradise, I'm sure, it's obvious.
I do not want to hear "dynamic tehrmo machin"
is that we do not take the right angle to address the problem, we do not consider the right solutions.
On the other hand it is possible that to envisage the good solutions, it is necessary to revise our instinct of survival morbidly placed in the psychological sphere ...
Or another angle welcome.
In fact, I hate closing remarks that say there is no solution (from one angle only, it's probably true).
It simply means that the angle is no longer the right one and that we have to find another angle, where real perennial solutions can emerge.
PS: Cross the iron, brings sensations, it allows to feel exist, not to feel empty.
In addition if you win the duel, you feel stronger, the EGO swells, it brings satisfaction.
The search for satisfaction is the main driver of our actions, after each finds his pleasures where he can, wherever he wants.
In the end everything revolves around "the
idea to be someone "(ego), to survive, to swell, to destroy what comes to challenge it, to attack it.
Paradise on Earth as I say above can only hatch if we humans calm on the ego.
it involves challenging ourselves in our intimate, highly cultural functioning. We live in a society that values the ego and that makes us sad sometimes ...
------------
I do not appreciate everything that is military but the truth is distributed throughout the planet, everyone has a little bit:
How one person (one way of thinking) can change the course of events.
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
)?
