Ahmed wrote:Rajqawee, you say:Ah. So what would be the subjects that should populate econology then?
Those related to Ecology, the only, the true, the Scientific. The one that does not bother anyone and allows you to consume in peace while cultivating the ideology that goes (so well) with!
There is no problem with that. If we do not want to discuss ecology but ecologism and politics, it suffices to say so. The scam consists in claiming that we would place ourselves in the field of ecology when in fact, we are only doing (low) politics.
Rajqawee wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:Rajqawee wrote:Let's say that without falling into the invective, we can ask ourselves the question: if you think that nature is shit, and that the massive impact of man on it is desirable for X reasons, why waste your time on a forum who discusses ecology?
Almost no one here talks about ecology.
Ah. So what would be the subjects that should populate econology then?
"Ecology or scientific ecology, is a science which studies the interactions of living beings with each other and with their environment. All living beings, their living environment and the relationships they maintain form an ecosystem. ecology is an integral part of the larger discipline of environmental science (or environmental science). "
Examples:
https://www.franceinter.fr/emissions/co ... embre-2018
Relationship with the vaccination pass?
Report with "Presidential 2022: what future for Macron and why?"
No.
I see the objection coming as big as a house that the vaccination pass or the presidential election impact "the interactions of living beings with each other and with their environment" so that their discussion is in the subject of ecology. Reminds me of a pretentious drawing teacher who used to say "I teach art, and since art touches everything, I teach everything"!
Well no. Macron's future is not part of ecology. We are indeed on an ecological political propaganda site. Out of the vegetable gardens of the lazy, hardly any ecology here. The bulk of the posts come from petty political agitators, many of whom roll for Philippot, and who shout everywhere whatever the subject, their hatred of consumption, of capitalism, of industrialists, slander in the worst terms the critical or moderate people who are 'express publicly, which contributors here like ABC, sicetaitsimple, Izentrop or me, rather than evoke ecological alternatives that people could spontaneously adopt.
The goal of their clan is political: to force populations to follow their whims, because they can see that they are not being followed. It is not tomorrow the day before that they will have the political power to do it , but on their site they have it, so they exercise it as their clan would exercise it if it had it: in the most total intolerance of contradictory opinions and the propensity to eliminate the opponents by placing themselves not in the debate of ideas, but in the lynching.
When rare ecological subjects manage to get out, they immediately recover them as outlets to bazaar us their usual propaganda. They are radicalized evil in their skin, 4 or 5 here are enough to suffocate all subjects. Flooding is their method against conflicting opinions, and if that doesn't work, slanderous lynching and censorship. Their pack is only a few% of users, but represents 80% of posts!
Both figuratively. It is true that both are blowing!