@christopher
Janic wrote:
So alcohol is indefensible
Blablabla ... you speak without knowing the subject personally ... am I wrong?
Eh yes! You're wrong! I have not always adopted my current lifestyle. I drank to vomit, smoked, no other drugs fortunately, I bitched like most people so I know
also the subject! But it is not me that counts, but what the medical profession says about it with its addictologists, specialists in the subject.
Addictologists don't settle for real addicts, but what leads to it
https://www.passeportsante.net/fr/speci ... dictologieIn France, addictology has developed by bringing together professionals in the fields of alcohol, tobacco and drug addiction. Epidemiological data show an increase in polyconsumption, and addictology wants to globalize and improve public health policies in these areas. The idea being to stop being interested in a product, but rather consumer behavior more generally.
http://sante.lefigaro.fr/article/alcool ... -le-coeur/(...) What weaken the discourse in favor of moderate consumption,
believe the experts. "
There is no healthy consumption of alcohol!", Annoys Dr. Alain Braillon, head of the alcohol unit at the University Hospital of Amiens.
«Alcohol is a carcinogen and a drug. The beneficial effect on the coronaries remains to be proven. And if it exists, it is very moderate, and without common measure with the risks of cancer which, them, increase from the first drink!". "People should know that there is a risk (...)
after each one leads his life, towards death, as he wants!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré