I re-resume the various points of elephant which had largely roughed the thing:
elephant wrote:However, I think that several conditions must be met:
1 °) to share the work to gather the e-mail addresses: writing of newspapers, deputies, general advisers, presidents of parties etc (for the latter, one finds their e-mail address on the sites of their parties and, in all case in Belgium, on the parliament website
1a) keep and distribute this list
2 °) share the work so that the e-mails do not all leave from the same address and that our interlocutors do not receive dozens of e-mails on the same subject: this seems suspect.
3 °) send all the e-mails practically at the same time, preferably one evening after 23 hours.
4 °) agree on a single text, with citation of the sources. (Including the original sources in English)
5 °) accompany a very courteous accompanying text that specifies something like:
"... we have good reasons to believe that public money is in danger of being wasted on such projects ... while American researchers are more advanced than us using much less expensive means .... "
6 °) avoid quoting too many people who are too well known to us, like Jean Pierre Petit or Jean Louis Naudin: I have the greatest esteem for them, but I am afraid that their name in the first attack will make them leave directos au basket.
7 °) plan reminder broadcasts
8 °) in addition to large addresses, each spam on its own private correspondents with invitation to broadcast
9 °) find a catchy title for the email
)