The “funny” Comedy Club

The developments of forums and the site. Humor and conviviality between the members of the forum - Tout est anything - Presentation of new registered members Relaxation, free time, leisure, sports, vacations, passions ... What do you do with your free time? Forum exchanges on our passions, activities, leisure ... creative or recreational! Publish your ads. Classifieds, cyber-actions and petitions, interesting sites, calendar, events, fairs, exhibitions, local initiatives, association activities .... No purely commercial advertising please.
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14965
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 26/01/22, 18:44

Macro wrote:
Janic wrote:he is not an expert economist but an expert deconologist


Leave the deconology to whom it may concern STP ... It is deserved

Oh yes!!! : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6527
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1641

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by Macro » 26/01/22, 18:48

claim deconoloctic status : Cheesy: : Cheesy:
1 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14965
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4363

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 26/01/22, 18:51

Macro wrote:claim deconoloctic status : Cheesy: : Cheesy:

I subscribe!
For funiiiiiiiiisiiiiiiiiiiiiiii: Image
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by Obamot » 26/01/22, 19:33

Exnihiloest wrote:Still in the ad personam attack. In full projection, the 3 macaques.
You're not there, it's attack ad pe-loses his soul. : Mrgreen:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by Janic » 27/01/22, 09:39

it has no soul! A chip has been grafted into his brain connected to a machine that has no soul either!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
jean.caissepas
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 660
Registration: 01/12/09, 00:20
Location: R.alpes
x 423

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by jean.caissepas » 27/01/22, 10:34

A little reflection for the (not) "funny" who too often call others anti-vax!

0 x
Past habits must change,
because the future must not die.
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by Obamot » 27/01/22, 14:09

According to HAS, Gardasil:

has an efficacy in preventing cancers that has yet to be demonstrated

So it is useless since that would be its purpose? Even worse:

However, the vaccine is only effective against the strains of the virus concerned if they are not already established. If they are already installed, According to this study, Gardasil would increase the risk of having precancerous lesions, and therefore a risk of developing cancer, and therefore in this case has the opposite effect to that desired.
Wow, nothing changes there yet: “Health Business is Business”
France is very conciliatory with the pharmas, business to follow.

Wiki source.
0 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3798
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1321

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by pedrodelavega » 27/01/22, 20:54

Obamot wrote:According to HAS, Gardasil:

has an efficacy in preventing cancers that has yet to be demonstrated

So it is useless since that would be its purpose? Even worse:

However, the vaccine is only effective against the strains of the virus concerned if they are not already established. If they are already installed, According to this study, Gardasil would increase the risk of having precancerous lesions, and therefore a risk of developing cancer, and therefore in this case has the opposite effect to that desired.
Wow, nothing changes there yet: “Health Business is Business”
France is very conciliatory with the pharmas, business to follow.

Wiki source.


Source wiki....outdated...as mentioned at the beginning of the page (you could have pointed it out)

capture.jpg
Capture.jpg (34.56 KB) Viewed times 928

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil

: roll:

A more recent review: : Arrowd:

0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by Obamot » 27/01/22, 21:10

1) First I would like to point out that what you say comes from the same wikipedia article, and if the doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine have not been removed... it's good that they persist! And the fact that the HAS now says something else has no probity value, the proof it violates the Nuremberg Code with the experimentation of pseudo vaccines against covid on human guinea pigs.

So I'm putting it back, it's totally valid

Obamot wrote:
has an efficacy in preventing cancers that has yet to be demonstrated

So it's useless since that would be its purpose? Even worse:

However, the vaccine is only effective against the strains of the virus concerned if they are not already established. If they are already installed, According to this study, Gardasil would increase the risk of having precancerous lesions, and therefore a risk of developing cancer, and therefore in this case has the opposite effect to that desired.
Wow, nothing changes there yet: “Health Business is Business”
France is very conciliatory with the pharmas, business to follow.

Wiki source.

or else you get us a serious study that proves your point

2) You don't have to say that to me...

3) Yes, the guys should even be vaccinated, said Professor Raoult (giggling). The problem is "that he spoke as a salaried doctor of the Administration and respectful of the laws.” (as he has repeated many times. If the administration says to communicate on a vaccine, the IHU obeys but that's not what he thinks of him as a scientist ) is worth placebo according to Pr Raoult's latest video (how to administer a vaccine is worth more than the vaccine, so perlimpinpin powder... FTG.)



4) You understand why you're stupid and in the Comedy club now.
0 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3798
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1321

Re: The “funny” Comedy Club




by pedrodelavega » 28/01/22, 16:09

Obamot wrote:or else you get us a serious study that proves your point

The full opinion of the HAS with all the studies referenced or directly linked:
https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/ev ... &17456.pdf
It's a bit long. In summary, it meets exactly the recommendations of D.Raoult in the video I quoted above.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "The bistro: site life, leisure and relaxation, humor and conviviality and Classifieds"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 305 guests