AD 44 wrote:[for] non compatibility or disagree?
It is not that differences or agreements are a problem, on the contrary, but rather that saturation comes from constant submergence:
would it be worth tackling the causes?
AD 44 wrote:[for] non compatibility or disagree?
it is exactly that, it becomes so rotten that everyone stops on this subject which releases the remainder, that it will stop all alone for lack of combatants. And finally we will wait until the end of the match rather than making predictions about an unknown future! The virus itself poisons enough people without adding debates that are no longer there and from which emerge only irreconcilable opposing camps that can continue to eat their noses for plums!I tell myself that one subject is too much. It will have 3000 pages, [*] there will be cross-discussions on two themes, etc.
Janic wrote:it is exactly that, it becomes so rotten that everyone stops on this subject which releases the remainder, that it will stop all alone for lack of combatants. And finally we will wait until the end of the match rather than making predictions about an unknown future! The virus itself poisons enough people without adding debates that are no longer there and from which emerge only irreconcilable opposing camps that can continue to eat their noses for plums!I tell myself that one subject is too much. It will have 3000 pages, [*] there will be cross-discussions on two themes, etc.
Or then, a subject reserved for provaxxes and a subject reserved for proliberty that everyone can consult without being able to argue, well one can hope so, each camp contenting itself with presenting its arguments. Thesis on the one hand, antithesis on the other and it is up to the reader to make his own synthesis since it is about a fight without an appointed referee.
[*] look at the abundant subject of Did where everything is going rather well since it only brings together its own supporters
completely agree but it is not the reality in the facts when a topical subject is so controversial, it is no longer the reason which is expressed there but the feelings generated by fear or indifference .This is really not the point of a forum ! The goal is precisely for it to be a space for discussion, even argument, but with respect. Otherwise, you have to start a blog.
this is why it is not controversial because it does not touch the vibrating string of emotion precisely. With or without tillage in this or that way, gardeners plant and harvest carrots, but not the obligation or the prohibition to grow carrots, this does not call gardening into question, but a simple cultivation mode. While for the covid, it affects the freedom of choice and conscience which is not at all at the same level!The subject of Didier is a subject, above all, with a single theme: the vegetable garden, without tillage and without synthetic products.
Rajqawee wrote:This is really not the point of a forum ! The goal is precisely for it to be a space for discussion, even argument, but with respect. Otherwise, you have to open a blog.
Go back to "The bistro: site life, leisure and relaxation, humor and conviviality and Classifieds"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 240 guests