The “funny” Comedy Club

[Obamot]

it is a protected and rare species, few individuals in circulation, it must not be touched, because of the biodiversity coughed...

En voice of disappearance ... The males of the species devouring the genitalia before puberty

I don't look like that, but I became MacroYou are not

A kind of Commun-Nist but who takes himself for Nietzsche: (Bless you!)

O ALL POWERFUL!

[Obamot]

And if you wanted the same quality as “non-Russian” news, what would be the percentage advertised for the effectiveness of “vaccines”?

well, after most of the fragile non-vaccinated are already dead, the effectiveness of the vaccine can become very low, that's for sure.

well after that most vaccinated fragile are already dead, the effectiveness of the vaccine can become very low, that's for sure.
And stupid who shoots himself in the foot as usual and once again he does not answer this very precise question: how much?
It's like the claim, unquantified, that the pseudo vaccine has saved millions of lives, the same false talk since Jenner and Pasteur: evidence=0

I've never had that done to me...
But in agreement Janic, remarks that his initial uncorrected proposal is even more insane since the disease did not kill around 99,5% in France (even 99,80% according to WHO figures) and we can therefore doubt that he did it on purpose!



So a pseudo vaccine that does not vaccinate and does nothing on almost the entire population except poisoning it, you will understand why this troll avoids giving percentages of effectiveness!



And in the end, it becomes clear again that the “funny ones” are not there to have fair debates.

[Janic]

you will understand why this troll avoids giving efficiency percentages!

simply because given his flagrant incompetence in this area, he does not know and cannot do it.

[Obamot]

you will understand why this troll avoids giving efficiency percentages!

simply because given his flagrant incompetence in this area, he does not know and cannot do it.

Usually care bears are the kings of copy/paste
There radio silence, it shaves the walls, borders on the code, and makes curls to avoid the subject!

It's an overall strategy, as if the brats of the "Comedy Club" had given themselves the word...
And after that to claim that they would not be sponsored! THEUH!

[Obamot]

O ALL POWERFUL!

[…] no need to quibble for pages.

Company-and-philosophy / the-campaign-sexist-and-adopteunmec feminisation-de-our-society t15336-250.html # p502583

No nothing...

[Janic]

ABCile wrote:

[…] no need to quibble for pages.

this is exactly what you have been asked to do for 2 years, but it seems that you are deaf to this suggestion. So: lay down, to the kennel the pug!

[Obamot]

ABCile wrote:

[…] no need to quibble for pages.

this is exactly what you have been asked to do for 2 years, but it seems that you are deaf to this suggestion. So: lying down, in the doghouse the pug!

He is more like rockets in daisies, Gilette

Ah that's it, we would have found the second rocket "who did not fall” on the Russian Mall... but that was just:
- “planted in the roof”

So without farting, and so despite the hundred meter high flames, the Center had NOT been able to burn: tyCONPduringRien?
Do not look further. Me neither, it's Kiki's delirium...

But here it is:

EA3726C8-49CC-4A5A-8BD5-40840F2A2796.png (744.1 Kio) Consulté 1187 fois

In fact, it didn't crash into the roof, it remained in levitation...

Alright Kiki-ABC, are we pissing you off?

[Obamot]

HS source here electric-transport/drive-every-day-in-an-electric-car-t16945-170.html#p504536

understood perfectly that his sickly obscurantism was targeted.

First you should be the first to make sure that said subject does not deviate. And in addition to express a nn sense, the “obscurantists” are you the “funny” (and Phil59 is not one of them, on the contrary he seeks to avoid what you do), you “funny” who planted you on pretty much everything about covid for 2 years, and who shaves the walls.

[Obamot]

What? What shocks you?

CHICHE Well suddenly that they show us the bunker intact by journalists on the spot... And we'll talk about it...

You're talking rubbish:
https://www.tf1info.fr/international/vi ... 54447.html

answer here because it's not better. For the sources they are in the document. So I only respond to the LCi link which is a mountain of nonsense.

1) You are tiring, first you can consider LCI as kyiv regime propaganda.
V/ - the 1st contradictory source an Internet user = zero

2) On why NATO would not have retaliated? Well first there was Nordstream, and NOT yet because the Russian strike WAS already a severe retaliation following the attack on Russian territory by Ukraine

3) Then story of the drone against an ambulance that has nothing to do

4) Then as the so-called source a site that has nothing to do with Russians and cataloged as I don't know what. Do not forget that the Ukrainians are already experts in jamming tracks. And therefore nothing to do with the Russian Ministry of Defense.

5) Then the link of the TASS Agency Russian text translated:

"The Russian Ministry of Defense has released footage showing the destruction of two Ukrainian Armed Forces infantry fighting vehicles as a result of the impact of a precision-guided munition.
Video: Russian Defense Ministry"

What relationship with the strike on the Ukrainian base: zero.

6) Then return to a twitter user = zero

7) Then sophistical argument: "that the press of the whole world would have kept this news under silence"
Uh seriously guys that we are already told who sabotaged Nortdstream! Then it happened on Ukrainian soil, do you think kyiv is going to confess anything?
But are you kidding or what? And NATO can't admit anything since they have absolutely NO right to be in Ukraine which is NOT part of NATO. Ah bah here, argument / s completely bogus / s.

8} Then a tweet with images taken from an account of an illustrious stranger, nothing to do. No Russian intervention therein can.

9) Conclusion:
All these sources are bogus and have nothing to do with the Russian MOD
I'm asking you to have a reporter on site show footage of the intact bunker with proof of the date. So far there is nothing.

Really nonsense and then you would like to talk about "credibility" but you have absolutely none, especially you simpleton (look at your rag) you publish nothing you are always there with the beautiful role to criticize and you, what is -what you do? Nothing ! You are completely useless, parasites on this forum.

You have to dare anyway.
I can imagine if everyone did the same

LoooooooooooooooooooooooL
Bein starts by posting something relevant and then we'll see later.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

You can gesticulate all you want, there was no NATO bunker destroyed by a Russian missile. Point bar.