Woodcutter wrote:Toutafé dakor, but how does a farmer have a responsibility in the greed of a promoter who does not take into account all the data of the problem (it is too expensive and it can make the business collapse .. . ) when he is setting up a real estate project?
It is that there is undoubtedly a legal vacuum to be filled ...
If you re-read my words above you will see that I did not accuse only the farmer but the "system" (made up in particular: of buyers of vegetables at low prices and sellers of fertilizers ...)
bham wrote:your reaction is the opposite of an econological objective which could aim to denounce the use of pesticides as being dangerous for health.
[...]
but to do so, it would already be necessary to admit that there could be danger. [...] ".
1) No amalgam please ... mine is clear and clear: pesticide legislation is needed for any real estate project not a professional! If an individual buys and renovates a house close to an intensive farming field it is his own responsibility but if he buys new housing it is something else!
2) I hope you laugh about the danger: can you believe that farmers must wear gas masks to make the dosages?